S
Snelly
Guest
Reading the blades thread made me ponder a wider issue around custom fitting.
In essence, it seems to me that the modern view of custom fitting clubs is basically that it is an essential aspect of buying new irons.
It would appear, especially from the golfing media and manufacturers, that every golfer should be given clubs with the right swing weight, launch angle, shaft length, correct flex, proper grip thickness, optimised kick point, ideal smash factor and so on.
Having never been fitted for any clubs that I have ever played with, I don't share this view but as I am ignorant to it, am open to persuasion that it is a necessary step to better golf.
I have personally used common sense or simple bias when selecting kit. I choose stiff shafts because I have a high clubhead speed but everything else comes down to aesthetics or price for me I reckon. For example, I have got the irons I have got because my mate gave them to me for £50. And I chose my driver because it was a Ping with the right loft and had an electric blue shaft!
I suppose what I am saying is that I have played some good golf without the benefit of technology helping me to get optimised equipment and consequently, hold the view that it can't make that much of a difference.
That said, I bet it is good fun to go on these machines to find out all the various facts about your swing and I am certainly not being critical of anyone who does this. I just wonder that aside from removing the nagging doubt that your equipment might not be perfect for you, what material difference does it make at the level of golf we generally play?
I'd argue not much but would love to read about people who have done it and seen their handicap come down markedly as a result.
I am not trying to cause an argument and as I say, can imagine that it is an enjoyable process. Just interested to hear the thoughts of others...
Cheers,
Snelly.
In essence, it seems to me that the modern view of custom fitting clubs is basically that it is an essential aspect of buying new irons.
It would appear, especially from the golfing media and manufacturers, that every golfer should be given clubs with the right swing weight, launch angle, shaft length, correct flex, proper grip thickness, optimised kick point, ideal smash factor and so on.
Having never been fitted for any clubs that I have ever played with, I don't share this view but as I am ignorant to it, am open to persuasion that it is a necessary step to better golf.
I have personally used common sense or simple bias when selecting kit. I choose stiff shafts because I have a high clubhead speed but everything else comes down to aesthetics or price for me I reckon. For example, I have got the irons I have got because my mate gave them to me for £50. And I chose my driver because it was a Ping with the right loft and had an electric blue shaft!
I suppose what I am saying is that I have played some good golf without the benefit of technology helping me to get optimised equipment and consequently, hold the view that it can't make that much of a difference.
That said, I bet it is good fun to go on these machines to find out all the various facts about your swing and I am certainly not being critical of anyone who does this. I just wonder that aside from removing the nagging doubt that your equipment might not be perfect for you, what material difference does it make at the level of golf we generally play?
I'd argue not much but would love to read about people who have done it and seen their handicap come down markedly as a result.
I am not trying to cause an argument and as I say, can imagine that it is an enjoyable process. Just interested to hear the thoughts of others...
Cheers,
Snelly.