Foxholer
Blackballed
A couple more idiots!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-59867046
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-59867046
A couple more idiots!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-59867046
A couple more dead idiots more like.
Another friend, who is a nurse up here in Scotland, says the majority of people she is treating or either young(ish) unvaccinated people, or pregnant women who have not taken the vaccine for fear of damaging their unborn child. She says she can sort of understand the latter, but it still doesn't deny the fact they have lost quite a number of mothers with their unborn child due to Covid.
Test daily Brian ( isn’t she on strictly?)
I had symptoms for 3 days before the lft test turned pos
Honest conversation between people I know on Messanger about a New Years eve party I decided not to go to:
Person 1: Just heard that xxxxx at the party has just tested positive.
Rest of Group: That is OK, we do not really know them and did not spend any time near them on NYE.
Me: You do realise that she may have caught it on NYE rather than having brought it with her and someone else at the party could of spread it
Loud Sound of Penny Dropping
Rest of Group: Ah, we better get tested then
Sometimes I just want to weep
Never thought I would see this in the
Guardian. The nanny state's mouthpiece publishing an article that basically says nannying isn't the answer.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ ... -scientist
In 2020 we didn't have vaccines, mass testing wasn't available, we were still learning how best to treat people with Covid. How exactly could we have protected the vulnerable, especially people in care homes?saw that the other day and found myself agreeing with a piece in the Guardian! A rare event and echoes a lot of what i said last year in advocating the core strategy of protecting the vulnerable while keeping as much of the economy open as possible was a better solution than long blanket lock downs
In 2020 we didn't have vaccines, mass testing wasn't available, we were still learning how best to treat people with Covid. How exactly could we have protected the vulnerable, especially people in care homes?
If its true that fully vaccinated people are far less likely to transmit the virus then maybe the answer now is to do away with the need to self isolate if fully vacc'd. This would massively ease the pr3ssure on workplaces who are struggling with huge absences, and may have the added benefit of persuading a few sceptics into getting jabbed
If its true that fully vaccinated people are far less likely to transmit the virus then maybe the answer now is to do away with the need to self isolate if fully vacc'd. This would massively ease the pr3ssure on workplaces who are struggling with huge absences, and may have the added benefit of persuading a few sceptics into getting jabbed
Correct , 2 of my kids have it but wife and I don't need to isolate. I have a few lfts and so far they have been negative. The kids are wandering the house too.Isn't that already the case?
My understanding is: You need to do daily LFT's if you live in the same household with no requirement to self-isolate if fully vaccinated unless you start to show symptoms or get a positive LFT. No requirement even for LFT's if you are fully vaccinated and have contact with someone who then has a positive test?