SwingsitlikeHogan
Major Champion
To be honest I thought Whitty was not looking or sounding that convinced when presenting some of the data as rationale for requiring the change being announced today.Having seen the briefing I've no reason to change my opinion that it was anything other than a sham, rushed through to try and change the front pages of the papers from one story to another. We know that the scientists have been calling for tougher restrictions, that's fine as they come from that side of the argument however we were told that it'd be a couple of weeks before decisions were made and then suddenly, on a day of terrible news for the Government, we have an important briefing to tell us we're going to Plan B. The stats that Whitty showed didn't even particularly do much to prove that there was a basis for the change IMO, not enough in the data to make such a big decision. They showed a chart of the SA cases even though we know that they're vaccination rate is around 20% so of course it is going to take off. I didn't see that he showed a chart on hospitalisations and deaths though? The ones I have seen in SA show that they are largely flat at the moment so probably doesn't suit the narrative. That's not to say that things won't change but after all the guff about following the data this decision really doesn't make any particular sense. BTW, I have no personal stake in these restrictions, they don't affect me on a personal or business level so have no skin in the game so to speak.
I absolutely get the imperative to tighten things up well in advance of things looking bad in respect of hospitalisations…so no complaints on that front at all…just commenting upon Whitty’s general demeanour. I had no such thoughts in respect of Vallance. I also get that Sage met yesterday and cabinet was briefed today, so I can see where a desire on behalf of the PM to act promptly given the evidence came from.
Last edited: