One Planer
Global Moderator
I was having an interesting conversation with a chap at the course last night and thought I'd pose the same question on here, just to see the forums view(s).
If you look at the brands in golf (TaylorMade, Ping, Srixon, Titleist, etc, etc), they all have staff players representing their brand and in some cases helping with R&D.
Here's the point we were discussing. Are certain staff players given priority within the same brand (Tiger Woods will obviously have more clout than say Stewart Cink at Nike)?
The example is Rickie Fowler and Rory Mcilroy.
Who is worth more to Titleist?
Rickie for the American market? or Rory for being a major winner?
Discuss.
If you look at the brands in golf (TaylorMade, Ping, Srixon, Titleist, etc, etc), they all have staff players representing their brand and in some cases helping with R&D.
Here's the point we were discussing. Are certain staff players given priority within the same brand (Tiger Woods will obviously have more clout than say Stewart Cink at Nike)?
The example is Rickie Fowler and Rory Mcilroy.
Who is worth more to Titleist?
Rickie for the American market? or Rory for being a major winner?
Discuss.