• Thank you all very much for sharing your time with us in 2025. We hope you all have a safe and happy 2026!

Articles you'd like to see in GM

It would be good if they did not give a driver costing 900 notes 3 out of 5 stars for value. Especially after stating that most golfers will struggle to justify the price and the performance and innovation only got 3 and a half stars out of 5. Well give it a poor value rating then. I'd see the value rating, especially in today world of financial belt tightening, as the value of the club based on what is out there in the market place .i.e. is it value for money for the average golfer compared with say a TM driver you can get for 300 notes. Not the value based on the manufacturers claims that it is hand made by virgin mermaids out of a metal only found at the bottom of active volcanoes in Iceland, or whatever guff they come up with. Anyway, rant over.

I agree with more emphasis on the women's game, especially the new young talent coming through, people who will inspire other young women to play the game. So more of the Melissa Reid type interview.

It may be me but I'm getting bored of all the mind coach psychologist thing and they are the first things I skip over. To me they are just a bit anal, and seem to suck the fun out of the game.

I really like the articles when they address a topic, such as dress codes and slow play. Sometimes I wish the conclusion would not be so woolly and sitting on the fence, but there's often some good food for thought. So more of them. I do think this is one area that the other mags do not cover that much. It would be good for example to have an in depth investigation on why participation and members are falling.

The new gear articles are always the same in every golf mag, mostly rehashed press releases. But that's not a problem really as what else can you do. Same for the instruction bits, again they are all the same in all mags, there's often 1 or 2 useful bits you can pick out.

I'd like to see more testing, especially the 10 point test reports which I think are very good. And at the same time don't be frightened of calling a spade a spade. Magazines manage to review cars, albums, books, mp3 players, toasters, concubines etc etc and give them a wide range of marks based on the subjective thoughts of the reviewer every week. So why is golf equipment so different in that hardly any comment other than positive comment and high marks are allowed?

I kind of like the big tests, especially the one they did with the drivers where the staff tested them and gave some real opinions. But I am not convinced by things like the current glove test where GM gives a verdict, as the conclusion always is that they are very good, so what have I learnt?? Other than all gloves are good.

And I kind of like it when some writer reports form some fantastic golf trip they have been on that the vast majority of the rest of us will never get to do. There is a small part of me that thinks it just showing off, but mostly I think, well done sir, getting paid to travel the word, get well looked after by the company that is paying for the trip and playing some fantastic golf courses. Living the dream. ;)

Other than that, a bit of humour and fun would not go amis as it can get a bit dry and serious.

Oh, and more stuff for lefties. Not sure what % we make up, but I can't remember ever seeing an article/instruction specifically aimed at them. Not one. The most I ever see is very occasionally a capture of a swing by Bubba or Lefty. After all, lefties have won a couple of majors recently, and arguably the most fun/charismatic and classiest golfers currently playing are both lefties.
 
Last edited:
its quite common that manufacturers dont allow direct testing against any others equipment, read a feature on premium balls test and see if you can spot a review of a Pro V1 compared to a lethal, Z star or hex.......

Please someone correct me if I am wrong, but I think Titliest are the only ones guilty of that.
 
I liked the OPs suggestion but also agree that it is not something that the manufacturers are likely to help with. That said, if one did do it and show improvements on each generation of club then they would certainly go up in my estimation.

I also like the suggestion of more 'affordable' courses. The top 100 Hidden Gems section they did a couple of years ago was a great ideal and I know it meant alot to the clubs that were in it (Belton Park was one of them). Certainly my interest is more in where I can get a top round of gofl for £30.00. Do we really need a review to tell us that Open venues etc are good courses.

I think that the ideas started in the Ping PYB section were good and could be developed more. Perhaps several manufacturers take part in the process with each getting a golfer to work with and the associated bragging rights for the one showing the most improvement. I would also add into the mix another golfer working with his old clubs and regular pro to see what the results were.

I have often said that I would like to see the reviews be more in depth and scathing as necessary (mind you the Lynx Boom Boom II driver review the other month was the nearest to a bad one that I have seen).

In general, however, I feel that these are still austere times and I would like to see the emphasis more on the affordable end of golf in all areas (kit, green fees, clothing etc) rather than the high end and aspirational.
 
I liked the OPs suggestion but also agree that it is not something that the manufacturers are likely to help with. That said, if one did do it and show improvements on each generation of club then they would certainly go up in my estimation..

Maybe get Golfbidder or someone like that involved... all the "older" generation clubs you can probably find on there, so having their name associated (and providing a second hand price) would be no bad thing - even if the newer ones are better, tests might show that the older second hand ones are still good value. Although maybe it is also not in their interest that fewer new clubs are sold.
 
Last edited:
Maybe get Golfbidder or someone like that involved... all the "older" generation clubs you can probably find on there, so having their name associated (and providing a second hand price) would be no bad thing - even if the newer ones are better, tests might show that the older second hand ones are still good value. Although maybe it is also not in there interest that fewer new clubs are sold.

Thats a great shout, the 2nd hand golf equipment market is huge, look at the car mags and the all have features of best used sports car under £5k for example... Used clubs feature?

best driver under £150, £100
best GI irons under £200

etc etc etc...
 
It would be good if they did not give a driver costing 900 notes 3 out of 5 stars for value. Especially after stating that most golfers will struggle to justify the price and the performance and innovation only got 3 and a half stars out of 5. Well give it a poor value rating then. I'd see the value rating, especially in today world of financial belt tightening, as the value of the club based on what is out there in the market place .i.e. is it value for money for the average golfer compared with say a TM driver you can get for 300 notes. Not the value based on the manufacturers claims that it is hand made by virgin mermaids out of a metal only found at the bottom of active volcanoes in Iceland, or whatever guff they come up with. Anyway, rant over.

Could not agree more... if ever the old one star was to get an outing this should have been it! Pretty average driver costs 900 quid... value rating needs explaining here!
 
What about a feature on some of the smaller club manufacturers... I'd never heard of this Orca stuff before joining the forum, what about looking into custom club fitters that bascially make a set just for you in the back of their garage... (don't know if that exists so much in the UK, but heard about it in the US).

Hows about something like "the secret footballer" but it's the "secret pro" or if one isn't up for it the "secret caddy", bascially inside the ropes gossip (don't care from which tour, LPGA, challenge tour, europro tour, whatever... would be fine)... exposing egos and prima donnas, stuff that goes on that we wouldn't get to hear about.
 
What about a feature on some of the smaller club manufacturers... I'd never heard of this Orca stuff before joining the forum, what about looking into custom club fitters that bascially make a set just for you in the back of their garage... (don't know if that exists so much in the UK, but heard about it in the US).

.

I like a lot of suggestions on here but especially this one.

There are a huge number of independent "component" companies making really good gear (KZG, Wishon, Orka etc) it would be interesting (and beneficial to the individual brands market awareness) to have a feature on them, what clubs they produce, why they have gone down the route they have etc etc.
 
Thats a great shout, the 2nd hand golf equipment market is huge, look at the car mags and the all have features of best used sports car under £5k for example... Used clubs feature?

best driver under £150, £100
best GI irons under £200

etc etc etc...

Absolutely- who WOULDN'T be interested in learning more about the second hand market?

The only reason I would see GM not having a bash at this is if they fear that their advertisers take the hump.
 
Oh- and learning about smaller / less well known manufacturers would be great.

My putter bought brand new is probably more expensive than the majority of putters used by guys on here (I got it for £60 second hand though!) but I don't know anyone who have heard of the brand.
 
I would like to see reviews of the cheapest clubs out there ie dunlop and how good they are, a kind of cheap V cheapest and see a pro/amateur play a round with them and see the difference in scores from the dunlop's to his usual set.
 
I'd like to see an article on the best place to go for a custom tee peg fitting.
 
I know there was an article recently about the perfect green but I'd be interested in a few more occasional article written from GK perspective.
Our current head GK started a monthly blog when he joined which kept members up to date with why's and whens of maintenance.
 
I'd like to see a monthly two pager on a current tour pro playing his own kit, versus some old kit, may be persimmon, small ball, hickory, sixties blades, may be clunky GI stuff, 3 club, one club, etc. bit of a challenge. A bit of spread betting, as in how close will the scores be, and say £50 donated to charity if he makes / misses the called buffer zone. See if shot making is still there, rather than peppering the yardages.
 
I'd like to see something along the lines of following one or a couple of the elite amateurs. Take a look at their day - what events they have coming up and the magazine tracking their progress and updating us. We could maybe get a group of GM readers / forumers out their supporting them a couple at events etc

It would be a great insight and help them get their names a bit more recognized and attractive to sponsors to support them. Who knows - maybe find the next Luke Donald out there.

Those who can remember the days of Tiff Niedell when he was followed on Top Gear etc will no what I am rambling on about :).
 
hi all

some interesting suggestions here (always good to get feedback so thanks for this) and I'll review with the team when we next have an editorial meeting

with regards testing of kit as we always point out custom fitting is so advanced these days (both in terms of the sheer range of head/shaft options available and the actual fitting process using GC2/trackman/flightscope etc itself) that there is no such thing as a best driver (or irons etc) on the market. So, I'm sorry if you want us to say here's the one YOU should buy, but we can't!

I could go through 20 driver fittings and at the end I'd come out with a 'best' peforimng driver for me.
One of the other guys on my team could do the same 20 fittings and I'd be 99% certain they wouldnt come out with the same driver/spec as me.

Then you need to consider budget and of course personal preference in terms of looks. I have a driver in the garage that i hit further (and just as straight) as any of the 6 others I have else but dont really like the looks so I dont use it.

What we wiil do is tell you what's out there (normally before anyone else will as we have some of the best access to new product in the world) and give you an overview of the product (remember to watch ourt youtube vids for some more detail/opinion) but those reviews shoud really only act as initial research. You then need to go and do your own homework!

If you're not getting custom fitted but just buying 9.5 stiff off the shelf (becuase that was the spec of your last driver or you think youre a 9.5 stiff sort of golfer) then youre doing yourself a massive disservice. By buying second hand all youre doing is buying a product that was right for the person who initially bought it. You might have a similar swing and launch the ball the same as the last owner but how do you know?

The caveat to that is if you really do know how you launch the ball and what sort of shaft will get the most out of your game then second hand is an option

Becuase of the effect of custom fitting I'm not sure what they comparing old models idea would really prove. Sure you might get one golfer hitting R11s further than R1 (its replacement) but that would be down to how the individual launched the ball.

As for how often to upgrade to get a significant performance benefit we'd say every 2-3 years for drivers/FW/Hybrids, 3-6 years for irons. anymore than that and you'd need to be a brand fan and/or have lots of disposable cash!

As aside I played with one of the world's foremost club fitters this week who has access to any head and shaft he wants and tests 1000s of combinations a year. His driver? A TM R9 Super Tri (Miyazaki Blue shaft). Why? It's what performs best for him!
 
Top