Wolfman
Tour Rookie
Good point about the possible inheritance but remember if they need care home fees in the future they will be forced to sell the home to fund it !
Good point about the possible inheritance but remember if they need care home fees in the future they will be forced to sell the home to fund it !
Only if you're not smart enough to move ownership of the property into kids names or held in trust well before the event :thup:
Similarly to minimise inheritance tax liabilities the same can be done with all manner of assets.
Only if your assets exceed £325k otherwise it can't be touched and that won't change until 2017 currently.
Good point about the possible inheritance but remember if they need care home fees in the future they will be forced to sell the home to fund it !
You would have equally as much to show for a 3 year mortgage paying 21k. It costs money to live in the 1st world, very easy for us to forget this.The idea that I could live in a place for three years and pay £21k+ with nothing to show for it is horrible. If I were to be able to live with relatives and save that money I'd have a deposit for a small flat (or decent house out of London). As it is, nout.
There are ways round it as my parents and I have just been through the whole process. I'm no legal expert but if you structure the ownership and "tenancy" correctly then it can be avoided.
Costs a whack to do it of course.
I am seriously considering one of these mortgages for life, where the mortgage company pays you the "free" equity in the property, they take ownership and you both live there until death, at which point the house is taken by the mortgage company to dispose of as they see fit. the downside being that there's nothing to leave your kids, but if we sell and rent, there won't be anyways.
You would have equally as much to show for a 3 year mortgage paying 21k. It costs money to live in the 1st world, very easy for us to forget this.![]()
True but I'd have the security of it being my own home and could set the mortgage at a more affordable level for me.
It's increasingly hard for non-londoners to move down here for work, especially at the entry level of business. Permanent jobs in my industry are increasingly becoming internships which are either paid very little or not at all. If you get kept on, you then generally end up getting paid not much more for the first few years. As a result, the vast majority of people on my level of the ladder are either Londoners who live at home or non-Londoners who come from a wealthy enough background that family will cover the cost of rent etc.
If rent keeps rising the way it has been doing, it will become almost impossible for people to move down this way. Let alone thinking about buying somewhere (I think average first-time buyer was 37 last year).
If I were to suddenly come into £50k I would like to think that I could put the deposit down on a small flat and set a mortgage that I could manage. Either that, or a two-bed place and rent the other room out at the sort of extortionate rates which people don't seem to bat an eyelid at!
Understood, in many ways though London is almost forcing businesses to move back into the "wilds" of birmingham, manchester etc, not a bad thing in my book.
I dont mind visiting London etc on a regular basis but Id not live there for a million pound pension.
Its not complicated, you can make gifts and married couples can pass unlimited amounts of assets between each other tax free. Its all about timing where gifts are concerned though as they can still be taxable within 7yrs of death so if you have over 325k in assets you should be putting the excess in trusts or give it out to family as gifts as early as possible.
40% is a lot to lose on every £1 over £325k if you don't look into it properly.
I now have far more disposable income and cash-flow than if I owned my property which has enabled me to retire at 53 (now 54) and with my wife going back to work, we have a steady flow of cash coming in