BTatHome
Tour Winner
Bit confused now too. In previous posts you mentioned that you had sent a 60 wedge to a pro to get bent to 64, also that you had bought a Dunlop 64 too. So you've had a 60 before, or still have one?
Bit confused now too. In previous posts you mentioned that you had sent a 60 wedge to a pro to get bent to 64, also that you had bought a Dunlop 64 too. So you've had a 60 before, or still have one?
i have a 64 but i ordered a 60 degree wedge and was going to get it bent to 64 before receiving it but i changed my mine on the loft adjustment as was advice on forum that its not a good idea to bend it past 2 degrees
What do you need a 64' wedge for exactly? Hit it 50 yards vertical, but 3ft long?
For when you have a 50ft tree I front of you and the green (thats 3 foot away)![]()
Go under it, I bet you can go just as close if there is space and with far less risk.
That is a pretty ignorant post mate, bordering on the offensive! Loads of players both amateur and pro use a 60 deg wedge, and all the big companies make them. You are well documented on here saying you prefer a 56, and that is great, but other people are different, why can't you respect that? I used a 56 for an entire year as my most lofted club, and I could play it open if I wanted with fair ability. Now I prefer to use a 60 deg wedge as I am far more consistent with it and I like some chips and pitches to drop and stop with little roll. Each to their own eh?
Sorry but I disagree. Certainly not an offensive post. I happen to agree with the post. If the OP is mates with a pro then the pro should be able to show him how to utilise a 56 or 58 and open it up to do what a 60 and a 64 can. Simple as. By doing that, it would reduce the need for the 64 and give the OP more options elsewhere in the bag. As both a 60 and 64 aren't designed to be hit as a full shot I really don't see the benefit in carrying two wedges with only 4 degrees difference for finesse shots. Or am I being offensive too?
Sorry but I disagree. Certainly not an offensive post. I happen to agree with the post. If the OP is mates with a pro then the pro should be able to show him how to utilise a 56 or 58 and open it up to do what a 60 and a 64 can. Simple as. By doing that, it would reduce the need for the 64 and give the OP more options elsewhere in the bag. As both a 60 and 64 aren't designed to be hit as a full shot I really don't see the benefit in carrying two wedges with only 4 degrees difference for finesse shots. Or am I being offensive too?
Sorry but I disagree. Certainly not an offensive post. I happen to agree with the post. If the OP is mates with a pro then the pro should be able to show him how to utilise a 56 or 58 and open it up to do what a 60 and a 64 can. Simple as. By doing that, it would reduce the need for the 64 and give the OP more options elsewhere in the bag. As both a 60 and 64 aren't designed to be hit as a full shot I really don't see the benefit in carrying two wedges with only 4 degrees difference for finesse shots. Or am I being offensive too?
Sorry but I disagree. Certainly not an offensive post. I happen to agree with the post. If the OP is mates with a pro then the pro should be able to show him how to utilise a 56 or 58 and open it up to do what a 60 and a 64 can. Simple as. By doing that, it would reduce the need for the 64 and give the OP more options elsewhere in the bag. As both a 60 and 64 aren't designed to be hit as a full shot I really don't see the benefit in carrying two wedges with only 4 degrees difference for finesse shots. Or am I being offensive too?
Well put sir. A 60 & 64 wedge in the bag together?? Why not carry two putters too. Madness.
people use the argument of reducing risk when not using a lob wedge. there is far greater risk opening up the face than using the natural loft of a wedge.
people use the argument of reducing risk when not using a lob wedge. there is far greater risk opening up the face than using the natural loft of a wedge.