And, we’re off.......2018/2019

D

Deleted member 1740

Guest
The scum bag who video’d him is banned by both Everton and Liv as he’s known as a seller on Fbook and Ebay.
Not excusing Salah using his mobile, but he is on a dual carriageway stuck in traffic and he’s getting pestered by kids and the clown with the camera.
Imagine the outrage if he’d of put his window down and started encouraging the kids by signing stuff.
Scum bag also reckons he didn’t release the video! errm you video’d him, your responsibility!

I've seen links to him and apparently he supports Yernited, not that it matters like.
 
D

Deleted member 16999

Guest
I've seen links to him and apparently he supports Yernited, not that it matters like.
Team he supports is irrelevant, horrible low life!
Have you seen the video of Citeh fans giving Carragher stick on sunday, that’s another bunch of scumbags hiding behind a camera!
 

Orikoru

Tour Winner
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
27,745
Location
Watford
Visit site
Don't know what has changed since City played there first game at the etihad. But to get the safety certificate City's first game to open the stadium was v Barcelona. It was played with a reduced capacity. So am not sure how Spurs would get there safety certificate mid season.
I could be wrong but I seem to recall that they were going to use an NFL game as the 'safety' game.
 

Papas1982

Tour Winner
Banned
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
8,556
Location
Canterbury
Visit site
I could be wrong but I seem to recall that they were going to use an NFL game as the 'safety' game.

Your clubsite had a legend game listed with lower capacity for end of August recently I believe.

It was always an ambitious start date, but better to get delayed than to miss the fault. Wembley having been used previously always gave you a safety net.
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
The FA and PL favouring london clubs again.....

I guess the FA got a nice little sweetener from Spurs to ensure the rules where ignored - suspect that’s where the transfer budget has gone along with the payments for the big corporate bowl they are building. They will also be losing money from the NFL matches that will have to move
 

pbrown7582

Money List Winner
Joined
Feb 4, 2010
Messages
9,050
Location
north yorks
Visit site
I guess the FA got a nice little sweetener from Spurs to ensure the rules where ignored - suspect that’s where the transfer budget has gone along with the payments for the big corporate bowl they are building. They will also be losing money from the NFL matches that will have to move

Nothing to do with the FA its PL rules. Clubs voted to allow the exemption as not to discourage investment in grounds, much the same as they allow clubs to request away fixtures early season to allow new stands to be completed, any ideas on who's taken advantage of this rule?
 

Papas1982

Tour Winner
Banned
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
8,556
Location
Canterbury
Visit site
Nothing to do with the FA its PL rules. Clubs voted to allow the exemption as not to discourage investment in grounds, much the same as they allow clubs to request away fixtures early season to allow new stands to be completed, any ideas on who's taken advantage of this rule?

Oi! You support a northern club, don’t you realise you’ve gotta hate the fa/London by default!
 

Fish

Well-known member
Banned
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
18,384
Visit site
I guess the FA got a nice little sweetener from Spurs to ensure the rules where ignored - suspect that’s where the transfer budget has gone along with the payments for the big corporate bowl they are building. They will also be losing money from the NFL matches that will have to move

I doubt Spurs will loose anything, but some contractor/s will be fined for running over and will be having some sleepless nights!

Levy don't take prisoners in business..
 

Fish

Well-known member
Banned
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
18,384
Visit site
The scum bag who video’d him is banned by both Everton and Liv as he’s known as a seller on Fbook and Ebay.
Not excusing Salah using his mobile, but he is on a dual carriageway stuck in traffic and he’s getting pestered by kids and the clown with the camera.
Imagine the outrage if he’d of put his window down and started encouraging the kids by signing stuff.
Scum bag also reckons he didn’t release the video! errm you video’d him, your responsibility!

I've just learnt about this Rob Wylie, but every club has them, getting his kids to sign shirts, books etc and then sell them online.

However, I thought Salah was still ignorant, if he's been told to not sign anything in those circumstances, then simply wind the window half down and say 'sorry, I can't sign anything here, club rules', and it all goes away.

But in saying that, the road was far from busy, he moved 10 yards in 15-20 minutes, he could have wound his window down and the very few kids that were their could have grabbed a quick selfie with him, there's no enterprise in that, or is this Rob Wylie Liverpool's Fagin and they were all his little urchins looking for a quick earner as soon as the car was compromised :eek:

:smirk:
 
D

Deleted member 16999

Guest
I've just learnt about this Rob Wylie, but every club has them, getting his kids to sign shirts, books etc and then sell them online.

However, I thought Salah was still ignorant, if he's been told to not sign anything in those circumstances, then simply wind the window half down and say 'sorry, I can't sign anything here, club rules', and it all goes away.

But in saying that, the road was far from busy, he moved 10 yards in 15-20 minutes, he could have wound his window down and the very few kids that were their could have grabbed a quick selfie with him, there's no enterprise in that, or is this Rob Wylie Liverpool's Fagin and they were all his little urchins looking for a quick earner as soon as the car was compromised :eek:

:smirk:
Salah, like a lot of players, does loads in the community and I don’t believe they should be available to fans 24/7, for all we know he could’ve spent the last hour signing for fans.

Scumbags like Wylie need outing. :eek:
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
Nothing to do with the FA its PL rules. Clubs voted to allow the exemption as not to discourage investment in grounds, much the same as they allow clubs to request away fixtures early season to allow new stands to be completed, any ideas on who's taken advantage of this rule?
Multiple teams over the years even before the Prem re arranged Home and away games , that for me is a world of difference to what Spurs are doing

You should only be able to play home games at one stadium to ensure that all the teams are on a level playing field when playing against Spurs - away teams against Spurs should all play against Spurs on the same pitch etc

If Spurs stadium isn’t ready then they have another season at Wembley
 

Orikoru

Tour Winner
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
27,745
Location
Watford
Visit site
Multiple teams over the years even before the Prem re arranged Home and away games , that for me is a world of difference to what Spurs are doing

You should only be able to play home games at one stadium to ensure that all the teams are on a level playing field when playing against Spurs - away teams against Spurs should all play against Spurs on the same pitch etc

If Spurs stadium isn’t ready then they have another season at Wembley
What difference does it make though? It's hardly an advantage to play at one stadium or the other, it's just different. So who cares?
 

Fish

Well-known member
Banned
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
18,384
Visit site
Multiple teams over the years even before the Prem re arranged Home and away games , that for me is a world of difference to what Spurs are doing

You should only be able to play home games at one stadium to ensure that all the teams are on a level playing field when playing against Spurs - away teams against Spurs should all play against Spurs on the same pitch etc

If Spurs stadium isn’t ready then they have another season at Wembley

I get where your coming from, but if they were only over 1 or 2 matches maximum out of circa 20+, then I think there has to be some leeway, however, they can't give a date currently and they are definitely well into October by all accounts and possibly won't play at 'home' until early November, if it all goes to plan?

So yes, with these circumstances of not being able to give a firm date I think they should have to abandon the new stadium and adopt Wembley for their home for another season.
 

Fish

Well-known member
Banned
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
18,384
Visit site
What difference does it make though? It's hardly an advantage to play at one stadium or the other, it's just different. So who cares?

If it's a rule then it has to be abided by, as soon as you start giving special dispensation then you may as well throw the rules away!
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
What difference does it make though? It's hardly an advantage to play at one stadium or the other, it's just different. So who cares?

Did it make a difference when Spurs intially moved into Wembley ? Yes , same with West Ham into the London Stadium - teams it seems take a little time to adjust to new surroundings and Arsenal had the same when they went into the Emirates, so some teams will face Spurs at Wembley - bigger pitch , different atmosphere, energy sapping and Spurs used to those surroundings and some teams will face Spurs in the new stadium - different pitch , different atmospher , Spurs maybe not used to eat. - lots of small variables that can affect teams , so to ensure everything is that same for all teams that visit Spurs they should be at one stadium as a home venue to ensure there is no advantage or disadvantage for any team

Right now it’s clear that Spurs have tried to squeeze in a new build in a year and have messed up - fans will be affected by this both Home and away and they still don’t know when it will be ready. It’s a bit of mess and the Prem should put the foot down and it’s one ground only
 
Top