And, we’re off.......2018/2019

[Kellfire]

Finally seen the Charlie Austin disallowed goal. Yep. Referee got it spot on. Yoshida had to move out of the way of the shot - clearly interfering!

 

[pokerjoke]

So Fulham sack Jokanivic and bring in Ranieri.

Good or bad move? I guess can't be any worse for the Cottagers as they're rock bottom

Hope it works out for him,big job on his hands.

 

[clubchamp98]

Finally seen the Charlie Austin disallowed goal. Yep. Referee got it spot on. Yoshida had to move out of the way of the shot - clearly interfering!

No he was not in the keepers eyeline so how is he interfering.

The ref went with the Lino who said he headed it ,but that was wrong.

 

[Orikoru]

Made the wrong career choice going to cheslki. Jose held him back slightly focusing on defensive side of the wingers duty

If he had gone to untied under fergie he would have flourished

Great player and a true gent

Stories of one day in training one the West Ham coaches was talking about waiting for his knee op (couldn’t afford to go private) next day a cheque was in his pigeon hole from joe to get his knee done privately

Sorry, just seen this but you are talking absolute dross! He was a key player at Chelsea for years, won 3 leagues and 2 FA Cups! And earned about 80% of his England caps while he was there. Yeah I'm sure he really regrets that 'mistake'.

 

[Kellfire]

No he was not in the keepers eyeline so how is he interfering.

The ref went with the Lino who said he headed it ,but that was wrong.

Because clearly the keeper had to take into account Yoshida’s movements therefore he’s interfering. Absolutely cut and dry.

 

[Papas1982]

Because clearly the keeper had to take into account Yoshida’s movements therefore he’s interfering. Absolutely cut and dry.

I'm someone that always says that any player in a keepers eye line is interfering, but that has long been ruled out as valid. The player has to be playing the ball. Pretty sure almost everyone agrees lino made a mistake. Even the opposition fans thought it was legitimate.

 

[Kellfire]

I'm someone that always says that any player in a keepers eye line is interfering, but that has long been ruled out as valid. The player has to be playing the ball. Pretty sure almost everyone agrees lino made a mistake. Even the opposition fans thought it was legitimate.

Well they’re wrong as are you. He’s clearly interfering because he has to move out of the way. Offside all day long and his embarrassing little rant adds to the hilarity.

 

[Orikoru]

I must admit, if you just watch the keeper on the replay, it does appear as though he hesitates very slightly before diving on the off-chance that the guy is going to flick it with his head. So understandable that he would be arguing that's offside. It's pretty harsh though, I think 8 out of 10 times the goal is given there.

It was nowhere near as bad as the Spurs goal that got ruled out against PSV. That was utterly ridiculous. Kane was on the opposite side of the bloody goal!

 

[Papas1982]

Well they’re wrong as are you. He’s clearly interfering because he has to move out of the way. Offside all day long and his embarrassing little rant adds to the hilarity.

I agree any player there should be offside, but the refs no linger consider it to be offside. The rant was ott as we should have conceded a level. But, I tend to go with the majority, and if opposing fans accept a decision against them, that tends to have a little bit of weight in an argument. But I’m ahapoy for us all to be wrong as clearly you’re right.

 

[Kellfire]

I agree any player there should be offside, but the refs no linger consider it to be offside. The rant was ott as we should have conceded a level. But, I tend to go with the majority, and if opposing fans accept a decision against them, that tends to have a little bit of weight in an argument. But I’m ahapoy for us all to be wrong as clearly you’re right.

Opposing fans also misunderstanding offside adds no more weight to the argument.

 

[Papas1982]

Opposing fans also misunderstanding offside adds no more weight to the argument.

It’s not misunderstanding. It’s down to differing interpretations. You believe he was interfering, others don’t. The fact that nowt has happened to Austin for his outburst speaks volumes imo.

Time to move on and wait til after the wonder that is the nations league, so the next controversy can rumble over these pages.

 

[Deleted member 15344]

Well two bits of news

1. VAR is to be used next year in the Prem

And

2. Each Prem club is giving £250k to Scudamore as a leaving present - disgraceful

Edit - forgot the news about Chelsea possibly being handed a transfer ban

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/amp/football/46218627

 

[Lord Tyrion]

Well two bits of news

1. VAR is to be used next year in the Prem

And

2. Each Prem club is giving £250k to Scudamore as a leaving present - disgraceful

1. Very good news, should have been used this year in the way it was used at the World Cup

2. Embarrassing and shameful.

 

[Piece]

Opposing fans also misunderstanding offside adds no more weight to the argument.

You've misunderstood why the goal was ruled out.

 

[Kellfire]

You've misunderstood why the goal was ruled out.

I haven’t. They made the right decision but by the wrong reasoning. That’s still better than allowing it.

 

[Deleted member 18588]

2. Embarrassing and shameful.

His governorship of the Premier League has resulted in those clubs making more money than many of them could ever have imagined so a £5 million bonus doesn't appear to be unreasonable in that context.

 

[Deleted member 15344]

His governorship of the Premier League has resulted in those clubs making more money than many of them could ever have imagined so a £5 million bonus doesn't appear to be unreasonable in that context.

He got paid £3 mil a year to do that as well as multiple bonuses already. The money been given to the him could and should be used for far better deserving causes namely local grassroots football - that’s £250k could get a 4G pitch for young footballers to use.

 

[Papas1982]

He got paid £3 mil a year to do that as well as multiple bonuses already. The money been given to the him could and should be used for far better deserving causes namely local grassroots football - that’s £250k could get a 4G pitch for young footballers to use.

Premierleague clubs coukd still do that and then some with the money they generate (courtesy of deals he's brokered).

It may be distasteful to some, but I reckon his payment is probably small in comparison to whatvpeiple in other industries get for similar stewardship and massively improved financial rewards. Football is now a business and acts accordingly unfortunately.

 

[Deleted member 18588]

Premierleague clubs coukd still do that and then some with the money they generate (courtesy of deals he's brokered).

It may be distasteful to some, but I reckon his payment is probably small in comparison to whatvpeiple in other industries get for similar stewardship and massively improved financial rewards. Football is now a business and acts accordingly unfortunately.

Exactly, just need to look at the recent thread regarding Persimmon Homes.

 

[Piece]

I haven’t. They made the right decision but by the wrong reasoning. That’s still better than allowing it.

Your explanation above isn't right though.