Titleist 67

[Curls]

Is anyone else concerned that Titleist/FJ are backing themselves into a corner with this numbering system?

No?!

2017?

Anyone?!

Just me then. Call me puerile...

 

[Deleted Member 1156]

Not sure where you are coming from? I believe it is to do with the number of years (67) that Titleist have been the no1 ball at the US Open. I was given a sleeve of no66's last year.

 

[drew83]

Is anyone else concerned that Titleist/FJ are backing themselves into a corner with this numbering system?

No?!

2017?

Anyone?!

Just me then. Call me puerile...

I see where you are with this......this year (2015)=67.....2017 = 2 years time.......

 

[Deleted member 1147]

67 = 67 years of Titleist as no1 ball at the US Open doesn't it?

What's the issue with it?

 

[Canary_Yellow]

So what will it be in 2017.....?

 

[Deleted member 1147]

So what will it be in 2017.....?

Are we seriously going to start tittering just because of the number 69 being used?

 

[Canary_Yellow]

Are we seriously going to start tittering just because of the number 69 being used?

I don't know about "we", but it seems the OP is.

 

[Foliage Finder]

Are we seriously going to start tittering just because of the number 69 being used?

Tee hee hee... He said it, he said it! :whoo: