larmen
Head Pro
Sending scientists into space makes a lot more sense than sending pop stars and TV starlets into light orbit. It isn't just what these 4 do now, it what it enables the next mission(s) to do.
I'm not taking an arguemataive stance, but.....dont the points in bold argue against each other?Steady on….solar system? I take it you mean Universe or galaxy. It’s been pretty much observed that if there is life in the solar system on planets and/or moons , other than on our planet, then it is not going to be anywhere near as advanced as we are.
The rest of what you say is good advice except the last sentence. It’s not good advice, but is a damn good prediction, unfortunately.
I do believe however that elsewhere in the Universe there will be much life and many civilisations, a lot of them in advance of ours, and a lot well behind ours.
To believe differently is giving ourselves a gigantic sense of importance. In the scheme of things we are quite insignificant, merely the most intelligent ( not most deserving) mammal on a pale blue dot of a planet among millions of planets.
It’s not in our nature to not explore. Furthermore, if we do not find ,and some of us migrate to ,other planets the human race will die out….probably and hopefully long after the youngest of us presently alive.
Professor Brian Cox made the point that the likely cause of the demise of the human race is not disease or population ….but stupidity.!
Space travel provides the human race huge movement in technology advances
It always great to look to move forward
Utterly pointless, a waste of money and a huge polluter.
It’s not the fuel that’s the issue it’s all the debris and crap left floating in space that is just jettisoned never returns and just effectively remain in orbit. We’re effectively just littering space with crap but it’s ok in the donor science and exploration but if someone lobs an empty crisp packet on the floor they face a fine.In what way is it a huge polluter? The fuel used to propel the rocket is liquid hydrogen and oxygen which when burnt produces water which is the white cloud that appears behind the rocket. I do agree that a large amount of energy must be used to produce the fuel, but if the research to produce liquid hydrogen more economically and efficiently, then it will benefit mankind as an alternative to fossil fuels.
War/Defence provides even more technology advances but that doesn't mean it's a good thing.
There does seem to be a lot of excitement about something less impressive that what was achieved well over half a century ago.