Recycled Pro V1s

thesheriff

Head Pro
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
308
Visit site
Hi all,

The last couple of seasons I've used recycled Pro V1 practice balls on the course (I'm unwilling to spend £40/dozen with all the ball magnets they place in the gorse bushes round my home track). Does anyone know if these balls are softer shelled or more brittle/fragile than normal?

I notice that after using one of these balls for a few holes, they scuff and crack very easily. They also often leave the white strike marks on the club face. Having not bought new balls in a long....errr...ever, I don't know whether this is normal.

Is this a trait of pro v1s in general or is the recycling or refurbishment process that makes them like this?
 
Imagine its something to do with the refurbing process. I've never had that with normal pro v1's...unless i've hit some ropey bunker shot.
 
I've never trusted refurbished ProVs! But Lakeballs are fine imo - provided they match the Pearl/A1/AA grading I select!

The whole idea of ripping the cover off and putting another one on, using different quality control specs, goes against the grain for me. Lakeballs are simply collected, 'cleaned' and graded. Degradation from immersion (certainly given recovery cycles) doesn't seem to be a consideration!
 
Refurbing is basically painting them so they look a lot newer/better than they are, however this doesnt last long as you are finding.

Much better off trying to buy last years model of a premium ball by one of the other manufacturers, can normally find something in the £20 a dozen range
 
I often buy "Previously enjoyed" balls (ProV1), however as I was given a nice little present of a couple of dozen brand new ProV's, I started to use those for matches/medals etc. Defo noticed that particularly when putting they felt much nicer off the putter face than the lake/refurbed balls.
 
I use these a ton for practice. I have about 100 of them that I use in my net at home. They are not consistent as some of them will have been underwater for .... who knows, years?! and some will have been in the rough for more or less or whatever. They then just clean them and paint them. They mostly launch the same but I have one that launches higher every single time then the others. Last month in the frost I was splitting two a night for about 2 weeks. Now obviously I don`t look after them but they are not looked after when they are under water or in the rough somewhere. New Pro Vs do not leave parks on your hozel when you shank... these do. Good for practice imo but not for play.. too many unknowns. Look out for Pro V1 X-Out balls, they are cheap and just have graphical defects but play as any other out of the packet Pro V.
 
Cheers all, I didn't realise there was such a difference between the recycled and the new balls. At least it explains why I'm damaging so many. Might have to fork out on some better quality balls by the sound of things.
 
Look out for Pro V1 X-Out balls, they are cheap and just have graphical defects but play as any other out of the packet Pro V.

Good call if you can get them. Either that or "practice" type or Blemish balls. I bought loads of Wilson FG tour blemish. Worked out about £12 a dozen. I've got a 5.56mm ammo box full of them still.
 
Hi all,

The last couple of seasons I've used recycled Pro V1 practice balls on the course (I'm unwilling to spend £40/dozen with all the ball magnets they place in the gorse bushes round my home track). Does anyone know if these balls are softer shelled or more brittle/fragile than normal?

I notice that after using one of these balls for a few holes, they scuff and crack very easily. They also often leave the white strike marks on the club face. Having not bought new balls in a long....errr...ever, I don't know whether this is normal.

Is this a trait of pro v1s in general or is the recycling or refurbishment process that makes them like this?

The thoughts I really have is :
Why go to the trouble of buying recycled ProV1s? If they're used and repainted, they are not really anything like a ProV1 as the original cover is a big part of the picture.
If you're buying something that's been re-covered, who knows what it was in the the first place? It might not have been a ProV1.

I think you are probably better buying cheaper, but brand new balls, at least you know what you are getting.
 
The thoughts I really have is :
Why go to the trouble of buying recycled ProV1s? If they're used and repainted, they are not really anything like a ProV1 as the original cover is a big part of the picture.
If you're buying something that's been re-covered, who knows what it was in the the first place? It might not have been a ProV1.

I think you are probably better buying cheaper, but brand new balls, at least you know what you are getting.

Not for the first time I have to agree. Why add any variables in. Go for a decent mid-range ball, or some multi buy deals, and take all the guesswork out of it and get consistent performance
 
Chris green golf sell practice pro v1's which are perfectly legal to use in comp's. Other websites are available.

Edit: just looked and £33 for 2 dozen
 
Last edited:
I used to buy the Pro V1 practice balls when they were new and from Titleist. Sadly they stopped selling them in the UK at least a few years ago

Just as good as the originals except for minor imperfections and half the cost.
 
golf depot sometimes have some good deals on, the AD333 tour for 14.99 a doz and likewise the Callaway Hex chrome for 12.50. Nothuing much at the moment but a good site to check
 
Stay away from that nonsense and just buy something like an AD333 Tour/e6/Chromesoft/NXT Tour. Alternatively buy premium balls from previous years. You never know what they did to lakeballs or how long they have been rotting in a bog for
 
I would rather have a recycled or lake pro v than any 2 piece ball.

2 piece balls are usless when the course is dried out.
 
Top