• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

Premier League 2019-2020 we’re off

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date Start date
I wonder where the panel will be holidaying next and what expensive watches they’ll be looking at the time with ?
 
The fine is not for any breach of FFP Rules but for failing to engage in a cooperative manner with the UEFA inquiry.

I'm not certain any of us truly understand the charges they had faced.
 
€10m fine for failing to co-operate seems a bit excessive.

Though I called this yesterday when I was discussing it with my PP.

UEFA need to take a good look at themselves at their set up. They wont as theres too many snouts in the trough.
 
Whats-App-Image-2020-07-13-at-12-31-45.jpg
 
€10m fine for failing to co-operate seems a bit excessive.

Though I called this yesterday when I was discussing it with my PP.

UEFA need to take a good look at themselves at their set up. They wont as theres too many snouts in the trough.
It wasn’t UEFA, they banned City. It was CAS who overturned it.
 
Me to but give us 10 million and we will let you off undermines UEFA.
Mind you they don’t really have a reputation to undermine.

From what I read that's not really the case. The way I read it, City have not been exonerated for the alleged failings that UEFA cited them for bit for the absolute shambolic way in which UEFA and their club financials arm have handled the case, which by all accounts was based on illlegally obtained information. If that is true it doesn't then matter how much truth is in the accusation.
CAS reduced UEFAs fine to £10m based on a lesser "conviction" of being obstructive to the investigation.
At no point in this has anyone "let City off" except in the sense that the absolute pantomime case UEFA built in the first place, effectively let City off.

Spot on about the reputation of the UEFA swamp dwellers though
 
Last edited:
From what I read that's not really the case. The way I read it, City have not been exonerated for the alleged failings that UEFA cited them for bit for the absolute shambolic way in which UEFA and their club financials arm have handled the case, which by all accounts was based on illlegally obtained information. If that is true it doesn't then matter how much truth is in the accusation.
CAS reduced UEFAs fine to £10m based on a lesser "conviction" of being obstructive to the investigation.
At no point in this has anyone "let City off" except in the sense that the absolute pantomime case UEFA built in the first place, effectively let City off.

Spot on about the reputation of the UEFA swamp dwellers though
So UEFAs ban should still stand, if the fine is for obstruction!
It’s a mess but that was to be expected if it involves UEFA and big money.
 
So UEFAs ban should still stand, if the fine is for obstruction!
It’s a mess but that was to be expected if it involves UEFA and big money.

No, UEFAs ban is only enforceable as the result of a proper judicial process. That is where they seem to have failed miserably. Whether City are guilty or not is immaterial if evidence is illegally obtained.
The fine for obstruction is, by and large, associated but for a different offence.
 
Went to watch Tonbridge Angels, my local non-league team, end of last year. It was great! 4-4-2 - big man / little man up top. overweight bruiser and little skilful centre mids, 2 quickest players in the team as the wingers, the tall old guys at centre back and the 2 least skilled players in the 11 at full back! Brilliant!

Have you got the right sport? Sounds more like a lap dancing club
 
Top