3565
Journeyman Pro
Very clever, have you ever considered coaching? You seem full of bright ideas,
:rofl:
Very clever, have you ever considered coaching? You seem full of bright ideas,
Actually, unless you either change to one or from one, then it's entirely subjective. And even if changing to/from one there's too many other variables.If a PSR is useful for you and works for you then surely its not hard to highlight the results of it working and being useful for you
Did you not disagree...
Just dragging & bashing a ball after ball with no focus is pointless & won't help anyone improve their game.
It's interesting that there isn't one Tour pro that doesn't have a pre shot routine. Their pre shot routine is down so much through repetition & practice that if your run a clock on them shot to shot from tournament to tournament it hardly varies in the time taken before each shot. The one thing Pro's are most aware of above all else are the fundamentals of set up before they do any work on mechanics & feel, most amateurs don't pay enough attention to the basic fundamentals.
A few notable Pro's have a long & tortuous one but they are the exception really, the majority have a PRS that's somewhere between 15 & 20 seconds once they step up from behind the ball after they've got their line to target.
Every very low Cat 1 player I've ever played with in competitions or just a free game, has one, as do I.
The familiarity of your routine helps calm the mind & block distractions out so you can just focus on the positive business of visualizing, aiming & setting up to be able to execute the upcoming shot for the best possible outcome.
If on the practice ground you doing 'playing practice round' it would involve your PSR to give it focus.
If you doing block technical practice, to work on a change, ingrain a 'feel' then you'd still be using part of the PSR, waggle or movement you make directly before the swing.
Just dragging & bashing a ball after ball with no focus is pointless & won't help anyone improve their game.
Well a PSR isn't needed
Seems quite logically - practise without one and it will ingrain itself.
When I have seen pros on a range you don't see them practising a PSR every time they hit a ball
when exactly have you seen a pro practicing or even practiced with a pro? Please don't say at wentworth prior to a round because that's warming up,
I can tell you 100% from experience not from logic, that every pro and elite amature practice a preshot routine and are taught the importance of such via their swing coach and sports psychologist,
Conditioning your mind and attitude to switch off prior to a shot is the single most important thing during a round of golf.
Would say hitting the ball properly is slightly more important
And practised and played with a good number of pros over the years
Some young lads and some old established pros - all have the same attitude , don't fill your mind with so much clutter about conditioning mind or attitude blah etc. Go out , relax , enjoy it and hit the ball - simple.
So would say your "every" pro is prob a little bit false unless you are suggesting "every" pro has a sports psychologist
I wonder what the players did back in the old days when there was no such thing as sports psychologists - how on earth did they ever get round the golf course
Some young lads and some old established pros - all have the same attitude , don't fill your mind with so much clutter about conditioning mind or attitude blah etc. Go out , relax , enjoy it and hit the ball - simple.
But they all did the same thing before they hit each shot. That is their own pre-shot routine whether they admit to having one or not. All top players address the ball the same way every time (usually taking almost exactly the same amount fo time every shot) and that has become routine. There again you'll no doubt beg to differ
prove
that its actually working.
If someone posts on a thread giving advice,or disagreeing with something someone says.
Why do they get all defensive and start arguing.
Surely if something is working for you,you will see results.
Imo if its not working then your results wont change.
I saw on another post that someones short game has improved considerably.
His handicap has not improved over the last couple of months.
I tend to agree with Phil[not all the time]but if you have some advice,prove
that its actually working.
What is better proof of something working than the practical evidence.
Won the KoK qualifier. QED
And the qualifying rounds or does one swallow sum it all up ?
Does someone playing to par one round and then playing 10 over the other 10 rounds equal to him being a scratch player ?
If you can highlight consistent improvement then possibly any advice you give could well be worth taking a closer look at.
To suggest something is working would suggest that results on the course would be improved on a consistent basis and with that the handicap comes down
I bought a new driver last week and to show the improvement in the games used with it
Two gross 71 ( rolls ups )
38 points - qualified
Gross 73 qualifier
And cut .4 back into cat 1
And all as a result of better driving and feeling confident
If someone gives me advice then I would certainly like to see some proof of that advice working over a consistent period
What is better proof of something working than the practical evidence.
Can't be bothered to discuss with someone that isn't prepared to accept anyone elses point of view (not just this thread). I've put in my replies (ignored to serve your own purpose) that I've had a couple of rounds that would have been better bar some lip outs or the one bad hole. On top of that I've won. Not bad as I've only played 4-5 comps so far (no doubt not good enough for you of course). As I say I'm happy with my progression and as far as I'm concerned that's all that matters. You only seem happy splitting hairs or looking for arguments whatever the discussion. I'm out