Foxholer
Blackballed
I wasn't just talking about Football Management. Owners too!...
I'm not sure about the too many "never wrong" egos in football management - I can see one very high profile manager like that but not that many others.
..
I wasn't just talking about Football Management. Owners too!...
I'm not sure about the too many "never wrong" egos in football management - I can see one very high profile manager like that but not that many others.
..
Yes the owner or DoF should set a budget that the manager sticks too so when the manager goes past that someone is signing the cheques - owner ?
I'm not sure about the too many "never wrong" egos in football management - I can see one very high profile manager like that but not that many others.
Signing players is always a risk - regardless of the player and team , even the top managers have made signings that haven't worked out and cost millions
Brilliant,absolute Utd Legend.
:whoo: :clap:
Who put the ball in the Germans net!
There are plenty of managers with inflated opinions of themselves and their achievements and as for leaving everything to the manager, please no.
Football managers and their apologists in the media have successfully built up this concept that only "football people" understand the game but there is little evidence to support this. After all the extension of this would be to suggest that good players make good managers and we all know that is not true.
However, the myth persists.
When it comes to footballing decisions within a football club that should be left to footballing people and not businessmen
Perfect example is Abramovich spending £30mil on Shevchenko - that was his buy not Maureen's
He isn't the first and won't be the last.
Not really sure what you are talking about in regards the media and football people ?!
When it comes to footballing decisions within a football club that should be left to footballing people and not businessmen
Perfect example is Abramovich spending £30mil on Shevchenko - that was his buy not Maureen's
He isn't the first and won't be the last.
Not really sure what you are talking about in regards the media and football people ?!
"Not really sure...."
Just re-read your own first paragraph. Whilst I would agree that the input from "football people" would be invaluable to solely rely upon that input would, in my opinion, be folly.
After all was it not Dalgleish rather than Gillett etc; who signed Carroll?
Can't help but notice that you talk about Mourinho almost as much as you talk about Tiger
& you even have a pet name for him,so adorable :rofl:
I cant help but notice that you pop up with little posts like that offer nothing to the on going debate - each to their own :thup:
Don't be so sensitive Phil. I'll leave you to add yet more great offerings to yet another football thread. You could try changing the record once in a while tho:thup:
Well it was Comolli that signed Carroll and Gillette had left the club a good couple of months before that
But Comolli also signed Suarez and signed Henderson so as with other footballing people has a mix of good and bad.
Would you like to see businessmen make footballing desicions ? Or would you rather those choices be made by people with the experience and background in the game.
As I said neither the businessmen nor the football people are infallible. Both groups are capable of making mistakes and, thus, I would never rely upon either to the total exclusion of the other.
Its getting a bit boring now dont you think - the tit for tat ? why make your initial comment ? what was the purpose in it - it offered nothing . Its not being sensitive - its just boredom from little comments like that from yourself which add nothing.
Apologies for moving the thread of topic - please mods feel free to delete the off topic comments in recent posts if you so wish :thup:
Can't help but notice that you talk about Mourinho almost as much as you talk about Tiger
& you even have a pet name for him,so adorable :rofl: