[1]Didn't claim they did - I said Div 1 hadn't won anyGiven I'd already gone through the results, cross-checking your table took seconds.
Among other things, and contrary to your claims, the results showed:
Division 3 players did not win "almost every" one-round trophy over the last 2 years; they won fewer than half. [1]
Division 1 players did not have no chance of winning; they returned a top 5 score overall in almost every competition, while winning several and losing out on countback in others.[2]
Division 1 players did not win zero trophies over the last 2 years.[3]
There were very few exceptional scores that might be considered unattainable by really low handicappers.[4]
There were no "tough to beat 30 handicappers".[5]
Division 1 is not always by far the largest division.[6]
[2]Jack Nicklaus used to say if he didn't win, he'd lost, he wasn't interested in second, how does that translate to a top 5? They won zero trophies for two years as ~ suspiciously ~ high handicaps didn't score as well when no silverware on the line
[3]You did in fairness point out 2 from 2023, as I then pointed out (which is when you shut up), one had gone from a 3 in 2022 to a 9, and is now a 3 again, he was a massive bandit off 9, he knew it, everyone knew it, but WHS goes with "form" and he was in a slump, "form" is absolutely the wrong target. The other was a 10 who also got down to 4 this year.....so
[4] You're just trolling now if you're saying 60s and 61s are attainable, even 63 or 64 is out of reach of all but the highest div 1 players. A nonsense statement
[5] zat richt min? Ye ken my club better than me? OK, richt enuch
[6]Div 3 is the smallest by far in all but one week, yet has more wins than the majority of the field. Remember when you tried to claim that they should win more often because there's more of them? Utter sharn that like