D
Deleted member 16999
Guest
The only burglars we allow to walk the streets are the convicted ones, you're talking guilty until proven innocent.If "it" is carrying out the attack in the name of religion, then you can understand why people put a religious tag on "it".
As for internment, what would you do? We don't let burglars walk the streets without a tag and yet we let those who are under suspicion walk free. I can't allow anyone at work to make a coffee without carrying out a risk assessment. I would like to see the risk assessment on letting these people roam free.
Assesment: Not arresting a potential terrorist.
Risk: Mass murder on a grand scale.
Action: No action available under the law.
No-one wants to see innocent people detained, but if it's a choice between that a dead children, I know which way I would go. I would rather err on the side of cation
Were are all these people who are going to gather the information, arrest them, interview them, lock them up, were's the detention centres, were's the staff, whose going to feed them while they are locked up......etc etc.
What we should be doing is manning, funding and resourcing our security forces correctly, they are doing a fantastic job with one arm tied behind their back.
Even with all that you'll never stop the lone wolf or the one who flips and uses whatever they can.
You can't simply lift anyone and everyone on suspicion, you'll waste more time processing the innocent and all British people abroad you put at greater risk.