Scotty Cameron
Head Pro
well it seems the guy has been arrested, whats the betting he gets of lightly... can see it now "sorry judge, I have a baby to look after"
I find it amazing that nowadays people rush to make excuses for the criminal with no evidence of mitigating circumstances whatsoever. Very interesting that this post was full of possible excuses for the inexcusable criminal behaviour but absolutely no mention of feeling sorry for the car owner now faced with likely substantial costs to repair the damage. Isn't it time we started standing up for the victims of crime and stop making excuses for the criminals? If we don't, crime will just continue to escalate.Bet your life that the Aston Martin driver parked without good cause in a parent and child bay, disabled spot or simply straddled two parking bays to avoid someone parking too close. Not heinous crimes by any stretch but a little more understandable I guess if thats what happened. Disclaimer: Parking improperly like above does not give anyone the right to damage someone elses property!!
I find it amazing that nowadays people rush to make excuses for the criminal with no evidence of mitigating circumstances whatsoever. Very interesting that this post was full of possible excuses for the inexcusable criminal behaviour but absolutely no mention of feeling sorry for the car owner now faced with likely substantial costs to repair the damage. Isn't it time we started standing up for the victims of crime and stop making excuses for the criminals? If we don't, crime will just continue to escalate.
i dont think it was excuses people were making - dont think anyone justified the actions - it was about finding reasons
The have and have not attitude
They are running a TV trailer for a wealthy/poor people program and the girl at the end pushing a pram is then shown saying "just because I'm on benefits I don't see why I shouldn't have the finer things in life"
Well I do my sweet!
Or... Maybe there is no reason. No mitigating circumstances. Maybe the criminal was just jealous. It's hard to accept, but there are actually people out there who do this kind of thing. What we do know is that the guy keyed the car, so why are we rushing to defend him with all kinds of reasons why a right minded person would do this? Maybe he is just a jealous criminal and I am afraid to say, that is the most likely reason these days.i dont think it was excuses people were making - dont think anyone justified the actions - it was about finding reasons
Or... Maybe there is no reason. No mitigating circumstances. Maybe the criminal was just jealous. It's hard to accept, but there are actually people out there who do this kind of thing. What we do know is that the guy keyed the car, so why are we rushing to defend him with all kinds of reasons why a right minded person would do this? Maybe he is just a jealous criminal and I am afraid to say, that is the most likely reason these days.
But now we have to be so PC. The guy has his car keyed and suddenly we are coming up with all kind of reasons why he deserved it! How about, just for once, we give the benefit of the doubt to the victim and not the perpetrator? Wouldn't that be nice?
The have and have not attitude
They are running a TV trailer for a wealthy/poor people program and the girl at the end pushing a pram is then shown saying "just because I'm on benefits I don't see why I shouldn't have the finer things in life"
Well I do my sweet!
I'd want to know why she's on benefits Chris; if it's a lifestyle choice then I'm with you. But I'm also aware that there are people on benefits through no choice of their own and/or for genuine reason and how those people choose to spend the money is their business, not mine.
I will be watching to see into which category the young lady falls…….
She appears to be getting money, food, a free place to live and help bringing up a child I really don't see, unless they clarify, why she should have the finer things in life too!
Or... Maybe there is no reason. No mitigating circumstances. Maybe the criminal was just jealous. It's hard to accept, but there are actually people out there who do this kind of thing. What we do know is that the guy keyed the car, so why are we rushing to defend him with all kinds of reasons why a right minded person would do this? Maybe he is just a jealous criminal and I am afraid to say, that is the most likely reason these days.
But now we have to be so PC. The guy has his car keyed and suddenly we are coming up with all kind of reasons why he deserved it! How about, just for once, we give the benefit of the doubt to the victim and not the perpetrator? Wouldn't that be nice?
I take your point, but I think the phrase "bet your life the Aston Martin Driver..." before listing all manner of parking offences he must be guilty of, gives the impression that the Aston Martin owner must have deserved it. In later posts he even becomes a possible adulterer! Maybe, instead of jumping to conclusions, we should go with what we know.Again i dont think one person has rushed to defend him - finding a reason for him to do is not defending him - there is a clear difference. Nor has anyone said the driver "deserved" it
I take your point, but I think the phrase "bet your life the Aston Martin Driver..." before listing all manner of parking offences he must be guilty of, gives the impression that the Aston Martin owner must have deserved it. In later posts he even becomes a possible adulterer! Maybe, instead of jumping to conclusions, we should go with what we know.
Personally, I wouldn't "bet my life" that the Aston owner did anything wrong at all. Contrary to popular belief, owning a decent car does not make you anti social. Keying a posh car though does.
I am the one making conclusions??? It's not me that came up with all possible reasons why this was done. I advocated going with what we know. The car was keyed and the Aston driver is a victim of a crime. As far as I can see, no conclusions have been jumped to on behalf of the Aston driver. We know, beyond any doubt he is a victim of crime.Again you appear to be making conclusions that arent there
There is a difference between someone giving a reason as to why an incident happens as opposed to that reason suggesting he deserves it
Lots of conclusions have been jumped to on both parties
Bu no one has tried to "justify" the actions of the car keying the car nor has anyone suggested the car "deserved" being keyed even if it was poorly parked etc
I am the one making conclusions??? It's not me that came up with all possible reasons why this was done. I advocated going with what we know. The car was keyed and the Aston driver is a victim of a crime. As far as I can see, no conclusions have been jumped to on behalf of the Aston driver. We know, beyond any doubt he is a victim of crime.
I am the one making conclusions??? It's not me that came up with all possible reasons why this was done. I advocated going with what we know. The car was keyed and the Aston driver is a victim of a crime. As far as I can see, no conclusions have been jumped to on behalf of the Aston driver. We know, beyond any doubt he is a victim of crime.