KenL
Tour Rookie
How can his £1 500 000 or so BBC salary be seen as a "loss leader"?
His value to Walkers directly comes from his constant public platform.How can his £1 500 000 or so BBC salary be seen as a "loss leader"?
Not in my electorate! With 54% of votes, my MP would have to do something outstandingly dire to be denied re-election!...
MPs well - they have a tin ear and a brass neck when it comes to accountability - we have one in court this week on a housing fraud charge FFS, but they need to get voted in each election, so the electorate are the judge.
Twaddle!... Of course it's much worse when a news presenter - Maitlis for example continually uses their impartial public platform for their private views. Zero accountability there.
Not in my electorate! With 54% of votes, my MP would have to do something outstandingly dire to be denied re-election!
Yet some criticise BBC for every perceived incident!
Btw. I also believe in 'innocent until proven guilty'! Your view appears somewhat different!
His value to Walkers directly comes from his constant public platform.
Do you think he works as many hours for Walkers for the £1.5m they pay him as he does for the BBC? And do you think he would be used by Walkers if he had not had the BBC platform all these years?
My point was that your insuniation of 'zero accountability' was twaddle!
I'm pretty sure this thread has quickly morphed into an OOB thread..It's certainly not golf related
Golf in general and the Lounge part of this forum in particular is very good for being an antidote to the 'real world' and the rest of the internet...Please help @PhilTheFragger
Maybe shows you how insignificant Seniors golf is…….
Meaningless statement if you're not going to provide any context..
The prize money at the Senior Open, the levels of financial sponsorship and the number of attendees of senior golf are three reasons why the contrary to what you've said is true. It would dwarf many or most of the sports at the Olympics - skateboarding anyone?
It's significant to people (attendees) and corporations who put up the sponsorship which generates prize money, indicating it is in fact 'significant'
Meaningless statement if you're not going to provide any context..
The prize money at the Senior Open, the levels of financial sponsorship and the number of attendees of senior golf are three reasons why the contrary to what you've said is true. It would dwarf many or most of the sports at the Olympics - skateboarding anyone?
It's significant to people (attendees) and corporations who put up the sponsorship which generates prize money, indicating it is in fact 'significant'
Meaningless statement if you're not going to provide any context..
The prize money at the Senior Open, the levels of financial sponsorship and the number of attendees of senior golf are three reasons why the contrary to what you've said is true. It would dwarf many or most of the sports at the Olympics - skateboarding anyone?
It's significant to people (attendees) and corporations who put up the sponsorship which generates prize money, indicating it is in fact 'significant'
They would take the feed from the host broadcaster rather than deploy their own kit.The cost of covering golf properly is very high. I’m guessing 40 cameras minimum?
Err.... Rolex, same as the Open and the Rolex Series on the European tour. I think they make watches.I said Seniors golf….not just the one off decent event….but how many actually attended (very few)….who actually ‘sponsored’ the thing at Sunningdale anyway? Hardly a proper meaningful sponsorship is it?!
IMO BBC coverage of golf, when they have it, is fine. It's nor more or less interesting or informative than SKY with the bonus of not having 15 minutes of ads per hour.