• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

Has Suarez done it again?

He will be banned for more matches for Liverpool than Uruguay for an offence playing for Uruguay

That again has no relevance, HE is the problem, not the team he was playing for at the time, your defence of him is very disappointing, its a repetitive offence, its not isolated, I think he's been lucky.
 
That again has no relevance, HE is the problem, not the team he was playing for at the time, your defence of him is very disappointing, its a repetitive offence, its not isolated, I think he's been lucky.

Has a lot of relevance - the incident happened playing for Uruguay not Liverpool - Uruguay should suffer the consequences of his actions and the player so should be banned from international football for an extended period of time.
 
Wow where i stand bye the punishment for the player it is hard on his club , Pool should appeal it IMO and have a stronger international ban ..

Believe that is what will happen.

Already the talk of that will happen - Liverpool have suffered through an incident not related to them.
 
From international duty yes - a year.

From everything, HE'S the problem, its not a bad tackle or anything really associated to the game of football, it was a repetitive biting incident, why ban him from international duty only, he could then be be in a position to bite someone in the PL immediately!!
 
From everything, HE'S the problem, its not a bad tackle or anything really associated to the game of football, it was a repetitive biting incident, why ban him from international duty only, he could then be be in a position to bite someone in the PL immediately!!

Because the offence took place on international duty.

The offence is not in dispute
 
Think it was ten games last ten - think this amounts to around 15 games for us.

Assuming he's still playing for Liverpool.

It could be seen as harsh on Liverpool but the ban is for the player.
He has seriously broken the rules and and he needs to be punished.
The player has to be stopped from playing - and if that harms Liverpool then who's to blame..?

I think he's got off reasonably lightly - 6 months would have been more like it.
 
Has a lot of relevance - the incident happened playing for Uruguay not Liverpool - Uruguay should suffer the consequences of his actions and the player so should be banned from international football for an extended period of time.

Your off your rocker, what part of recognising that the problem is HIM irrelevant of what shirt he was wearing at the time!!
 
Believe that is what will happen.

Already the talk of that will happen - Liverpool have suffered through an incident not related to them.

They kept hold of a wrong un who was banned for biting and wanted to leave, to give them a shot at getting in the champs league.

You take the chance, don't whinge if you get your fingers burnt...
 
Has a lot of relevance - the incident happened playing for Uruguay not Liverpool - Uruguay should suffer the consequences of his actions and the player so should be banned from international football for an extended period of time.

Nope he suffered the incident whilst playing football - so he should be punished from playing football in its entirety. And think the consensus among the neutrals will be the ban is very lenient.

Must be tough for Liverpool fans with this nutter at your club. I can't help but feeling if he was playing for my team I'd want him gone. Better to lose with class and dignity than win with no morals. Perhaps I'm a little old fashioned.
 
Has a lot of relevance - the incident happened playing for Uruguay not Liverpool - Uruguay should suffer the consequences of his actions and the player so should be banned from international football for an extended period of time.

if a salesrep gets a drink driving ban while on holiday should you allow him to drive for his company so they dont suffer as it wasn't done on their time?

Its an offence against people and decency, he shouldnt get off so lightly
 
Your off your rocker, what part of recognising that the problem is HIM irrelevant of what shirt he was wearing at the time!!


So now any red card offence playing for international team should also effect the player playing in club competitions ?

Gomes and Xavier assaulting the ref and Lino in the Euro tournament - 6 and 12 month international bans only - didn't effect their club

Pepe sent off for serious assault - pushing then kicking and player in the face then raking his boots down the person back - 10 games club ban only , WC - elbow in the face then a headbutt - 4 game international ban only !

If a player is going to commit an offence on international duty then that is where he must be punished as is the current set precedence from FIFA - to change that will now open a can of worms and lawyer will rip the ban apart.
 
Nope he suffered the incident whilst playing football - so he should be punished from playing football in its entirety. And think the consensus among the neutrals will be the ban is very lenient.

Must be tough for Liverpool fans with this nutter at your club. I can't help but feeling if he was playing for my team I'd want him gone. Better to lose with class and dignity than win with no morals. Perhaps I'm a little old fashioned.

I agree.gif
 
Liverpool have to appeal this surely.

How they can be the ones that suffer the most is beyond me.

Christ if his country go on to win the World Cup then his international band is half way done. Does it include friendlies I wonder?

That 4 month ban will quickly become a 2 month after appeal I would think.
 
Top