Swinglowandslow
Well-known member
Again, you offer this as a choice between public health or the economy. This is the mistake that has caused so much damage. Both of these go together.
An abundance of caution does not necessarily mean lock down again. It could mean properly police the borders, rather than abandon the red list and quarantine, it could mean more extensive Covid passports and less tolerance of bullshit exemption claims, and could mean MPs showing an example to the population in their behaviour and attitude.
But if we carry on with the half-arsed strategy, then it will be lock-down again, and those of you who have called for it will be responsible for it.
This idea of living with it is nonsensical. There is only one strategy that will work, push vaccination and boosters until the number of vulnerable people are too few to maintain outbreaks, and then the level of endemicity is very low. So if you think that saving the economy is the priority, you should have been writing to John Redwood demanding more focus on vaccination, Covid passports, mandatory NHS staff vax and all that jazz.
As for mental health, people manning that they are stressed or can't stand WFH any more is not mental health issues.
Agree with all that, except the emphasis on "properly police borders.....quarantine "
Once it is here then infections are increased by the populace predominantly more than anyone coming in. ( horses ,stable doorsetc) .Omicron was acted on very quickly, could say as quickly as logistically feasible, yet it took an inexorable hold and increase once one or two cases were "in"