Coronavirus - how is it/has it affected you?

[Deleted member 18588]

'edgy' or correctly pointing out the daily mail is a waste of good toilet paper?

Yes it must be, as nothing is true.

After all I read in it that West Ham had won a game but that can't be right because it was in the Daily Mail.

Just read the report and focus on the facts!

 

[PJ87]

Yes it must be, as nothing is true.

After all I read in it that West Ham had won a game but that can't be right because it was interesting Daily Mail.

Just read the report and focus on the facts!

But the "facts" weren't correct as Ethan said?

 

[Hobbit]

For those hoping to holiday in Spain. Several of the autonomous regions, e.g. Valencia, intend to open their borders to holiday makers on the 17th May. This will almost certainly be replicated through all of the regions as policing it would be extremely difficult, barring a massive spike.

Malaga is expecting to open its municipal borders(town limits) this week to travel throughout Andalucia. Most of Andalucia has already opened its municipal borders last week as numbers have dropped below 500/100,000.

Bare in mind, if you are coming to Spain that you follow the masks rules/table occupancy rules, whatever they may be at that time. I watched two police officers having a field day last year with holiday makers coming out of one of the hotels along the Playa. Everyone that came out of the hotel without a mask got a €60 fine - its €100 now.

 

[Deleted member 18588]

But the "facts" weren't correct as Ethan said?

And Ethan may be misinterpreting, I don't know but the report wasn't prepared or commissioned by the Daily Mail.

It was an independent report from an academic institution.

And whilst we are on facts the Press Gazette, on 23 February, confirmed that the Mail continues to have the highest circulation in this country.

 

[Slime]

It's made me very aware that not everyone follows rules laid down by government.
It's made me very annoyed that some people have benefited from government hand outs whilst, yet again, others will get sod all.
It's making me very angry that, whilst I've followed the rules, barring one thing, others haven't and that may, by Christ it better hadn't, affect me being able to start to play the game I enjoy.
It's made me very aware that BJ and all the elite running the country haven't got a clue what they are doing, and this saddens me.

Have a word with yourself ........................................ or change your name to Captain Hindsight.

 

[PJ87]

And Ethan may be misinterpreting, I don't know but the report wasn't prepared or commissioned by the Daily Mail.

It was an independent report from an academic institution.

And whilst we are on facts the Press Gazette, on 23 February, confirmed that the Mail continues to have the highest circulation in this country.

Would that not be generational because older people buy papers and they prefer the mail? Because you would be hard to find many people under 40 who buy papers.

So you need to take online side of things into account

Like online subscription

 

[Deleted member 18588]

Would that not be generational because older people buy papers and they prefer the mail? Because you would be hard to find many people under 40 who buy papers.

So you need to take online side of things into account

Like online subscription

Judging by the figures I don't think many people, regardless of age, buy print editions.

I am 71 and have not bought a daily newspaper for 11 years.

The Press Gazette figures include online circulation and still the Mail is way in front.

 

[Ethan]

But the "facts" weren't correct as Ethan said?

The facts were correct in bald terms, but misinterpreted, deliberately or not according to preference, because they were relating to significantly different populations.

 

[PJ87]

The facts were correct in bald terms, but misinterpreted, deliberately or not according to preference, because they were relating to significantly different populations.

Sounds exactly the mail's MO

 

[GB72]

I'm sure you know, but you are not affected by the vaccine for about 3 weeks after receiving it.
So meeting your friends might be 4 weeks plus 3 weeks?

No I will meet my friends if/when we are allowed on 29th March

 

[backwoodsman]

I'm sure you know, but you are not affected by the vaccine for about 3 weeks after receiving it.
So meeting your friends might be 4 weeks plus 3 weeks?

But, in 4 weeks it's 29 March so he can meet friends anyway (provided things go as planned).

Oops - beaten to it.

 

[PJ87]

Judging by the figures I don't think many people, regardless of age, buy print editions.

I am 71 and have not bought a daily newspaper for 11 years.

The Press Gazette figures include online circulation and still the Mail is way in front.

https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/most-popular-newspapers-uk-abc-monthly-circulation-figures/

Print editions..if you read below the table it explains how it isn't the highest due to the sun. Times and telegraph keeping their figures private

 

[Deleted member 18588]

https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/most-popular-newspapers-uk-abc-monthly-circulation-figures/

Print editions..if you read below the table it explains how it isn't the highest due to the sun. Times and telegraph keeping their figures private

Of those only The Sun has ever got close to challenging the DM.

Generally accepted now that The Sun has passed its heyday.

 

[Old Skier]

The daily racist (with a history of supporting the Nazi party) is a national disgrace of a paper

Always has been.


Also it's 4th

Metro (owned by the daily hail)
The guardian
The times
Then daily rubbish

https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/dec/06/dailymail-oswald-mosley

 

[backwoodsman]

https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/most-popular-newspapers-uk-abc-monthly-circulation-figures/

Print editions..if you read below the table it explains how it isn't the highest due to the sun. Times and telegraph keeping their figures private

Not surprising they want to keep the numbers under their hat - they've been haemorrhaging readers for ages.

 

[PJ87]

https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/dec/06/dailymail-oswald-mosley

Enough reasons not to read it's bile.

 

[Kellfire]

View attachment 35348

Enough reasons not to read it's bile.

There’s a strong correlation between being a Daily Mail reader and being a horrible person in my experience. It’s a disgusting echo chamber for hate and division.

 

[bobmac]

And absolutely nothing to do with Covid-19

 

[PJ87]

There’s a strong correlation between being a Daily Mail reader and being a horrible person in my experience. It’s a disgusting echo chamber for hate and division.

My grandad reads the mail.. I have to avoid certain subjects with him. He litterally is pumped full of rubbish they serve up

 

[PJ87]

And absolutely nothing to do with Covid-19

Well if you read the mail your more likely to suffer affects of covid 19 as the average mail reader is in the over 60s group?