SwingsitlikeHogan
Major Champion
You've just painted them as either worn out, OK, room for improvement or rubbish ?
I doubt I am alone - though I think some are doing well (you forgot to include that ? )
You've just painted them as either worn out, OK, room for improvement or rubbish ?
The journalists keep asking the same questions as they are the key questions, and we should know the answers, and the answers from day to day should be consistent and reflect the plans and actions that the government is taking. We should expect nothing more than that.
I don’t disagree on exit strategy - or on your last sentence.i disagree. and so do the majority of people. how can the government answer what the exit strategy will look like when they don't know themselves? should they guess? they don't know as they are waiting on data. they said this from day one. they clearly explained that constructive data will take 3 to 4 weeks to come through. yet the press keep saying "when are we lifting the lockdown".
if they did intend to lift the lockdown but didn't because of this data the press would be the first people to ridicule them for it.
on another note, let's just say they are holding information back. i cant blame them. People are stupid!! we have shown that. add that to the stupid press compounding every breath that is muttered by the government and you have a mess
why is that information useful to you or anyone at this moment? haven't they said that antibody testing is inaccurate at the moment?I don’t disagree on exit strategy - or on your last sentence.
But they could tell us the key metrics that they will use to inform the strategy. I believe the Scottish FM may be thinking of doing that next week. So for instance...positive antibody testing is clearly a metric - and so when a figure of 95% is reached for that metric that would be a point at which the government would be able to do what?
It’s all about building public confidence and understanding. Every minister leading the briefing will know the questions they are likely to be asked and so they should all be able to give a clear consistent answer and not seem to be evasive or indecisive. The journalists keep asking the same questions as they are the key questions, and we should know the answers, and the answers from day to day should be consistent and reflect the plans and actions that the government is taking. We should expect nothing more than that, but we should at least get that for us to be confident that the government is on top of things as well as they can be...
Besides - even main Tory papers are starting to suggest that the cabinet seems unwilling or unable to make any key decision without the boss. That’s not collective cabinet decision making and maybe it is that which produces what often seems to be evasion...
And I will repeat - I have no criticism of Hancock, Sunak or indeed Johnson in the briefings and Jenrick is doing fine.
It’s all about building public confidence and understanding. Every minister leading the briefing will know the questions they are likely to be asked and so they should all be able to give a clear consistent answer and not seem to be evasive or indecisive. The journalists keep asking the same questions as they are the key questions, and we should know the answers, and the answers from day to day should be consistent and reflect the plans and actions that the government is taking. We should expect nothing more than that, but we should at least get that for us to be confident that the government is on top of things as well as they can be...
Besides - even main Tory papers are starting to suggest that the cabinet seems unwilling or unable to make any key decision without the boss. That’s not collective cabinet decision making and maybe it is that which produces what often seems to be evasion...
And I will repeat - I have no criticism of Hancock, Sunak or indeed Johnson in the briefings and Jenrick is doing fine.
It’s simply about maintaining confidence in the government that it is on top of this as best it can be. And it’s not for me its surely more important for those struggling with lockdown. As far as the antibody testing...there will be one that is accurate and so the metric is on the basis of an accurate antibody testing.why is that information useful to you or anyone at this moment? haven't they said that antibody testing is inaccurate at the moment?
I get being confident in the government. I just don't get how you can gain confidence from what questions are being asked. the press have come across as a bunch of hillbillys that didn't go to school. I personally think they know more but can't trust us with this information. I cant blame themIt’s simply about maintaining confidence in the government that it is on top of this as best it can be. And it’s not for me its surely more important for those struggling with lockdown. As far as the antibody testing...there will be one that is accurate and so the metric is on the basis of an accurate antibody testing.
If we don’t find the briefings useful then we stop watching them or the government stops doing them daily...would we prefer that? And I am also clear that this is really difficult and uncertain and that the government can only be on top of things as best they can...and I agree that trying to put timescales on any of this is not appropriate.Do you not think that the "key questions" the journalists raise are the very same questions that the PM and Ministers are asking the experts?
The questions you refer to are a bit of a moving feast. For example, the original thought on ventilation, i.e. produce a lot of cheap CPAP devices. This is now being considered as not the best way forward. There's also a school of thought that some of the symptoms mirror altitude sickness.
And then there's the rate at which lockdown works, infections diminish. Do you have a crystal ball for when that will happen, bearing in mind that the experts all around the world are still trying to fully understand what's in front of them?
The questions might be, note might be, the right questions but at this moment in time the answers to some of them are of the "how long is a piece of string-type" questions.
Personally, I find there isn't an intelligent journalist asking questions at the briefings, and as for the repetition and rewording of the same question - very poor. There seems a distinct lack of patience. Maybe looking at how long its taking in countries that have had C19 longer than the UK is a better indicator of some of the answers.
It’s simply about maintaining confidence in the government that it is on top of this as best it can be. And it’s not for me its surely more important for those struggling with lockdown. As far as the antibody testing...there will be one that is accurate and so the metric is on the basis of an accurate antibody testing.
I get being confident in the government. I just don't get how you can gain confidence from what questions are being asked. the press have come across as a bunch of hillbillys that didn't go to school. I personally think they now more but can't trust us with this information. I cant blame them
If we don’t find the briefings useful then we stop watching them or the government stops doing them daily...would we prefer that? And I am also clear that this is really difficult and uncertain and that the government can only be on top of things as best they can...
If the answers to essentially the same questions are clear and consistent then there are no issues. It is when responses start sounding evasive that confidence might start to wane. So always put the best ministers up front to do the briefings. And make sure they are fully briefed. Most are doing as well as can be expected in the circumstances.
The most repeated questions are around PPE and testing. We have been assured repeatedly that testing will be 100,000 a day by end of April - that was the government commitment. I think it reasonable then for us to know how well things are progressing towards that commitment. We are currently at 25,000 a day. The government briefing tells us every day of the current number, but it is I think reasonable then to ask the question about the gap.
Very emotive Dr. talking/appealing/bemoaning on BBC this morning talking about a lack of PPE. I, for one, am sick of hearing this constant criticism on the subject and would be interested if for once they showed the opposite perspective as it is out there. Have a driver like @Fish tell the country about the deliveries made where the last delivery of PPE hasn't even been opened. Let the public know the full story about this issue and how the NHS are deailing with it...not just have a go at the government.
I 100% agree. I hope that I understand the issues as well as most - and most ministers seem on top of things and the briefings generally work for me. But I dislike hearing what sounds like evasion from others as I don’t think it’s necessary, and just doesn’t help. It’s not going to be the likes of me or most on here who are trying to find a way around lockdown measures and excuses to do what they want to do. But it seems that there are quite a few out there who will.I suspect that everyone's level of confidence might be different. What satisfies yours might not satisfies the next person but is more than satisfying for the next. For me there's two main strands to that confidence, a) do I like what I'm hearing, and b) what are those in 'opposition' saying about the govt's performance? If those in a position to significantly oppose the govt's actions are, in the main, supporting the govt... what's the problem?
I don't want to mention the hospital but my bosses wife said they have ppe boxes stacked all over the place and are repeatedly turning drivers away as they have no room to store it.Many drivers have been in touch with the mainstream media, they’re not interested, it doesn’t suit the narrative.
It’s not the government’s responsibility to ensure there was enough PPE at each and every hospital, that’s the job of the Trusts procurement teams, and they’ve been caught out and are deflecting the blame, imo of course.
I don't want to mention the hospital but my bosses wife said they have ppe boxes stacked all over the place and are repeatedly turning drivers away as they have no room to store it.
If we don’t find the briefings useful then we stop watching them or the government stops doing them daily...would we prefer that? And I am also clear that this is really difficult and uncertain and that the government can only be on top of things as best they can...and I agree that trying to put timescales on any of this is not appropriate.
If the answers to essentially the same questions are clear and consistent then there are no issues. It is when responses start sounding evasive that confidence might start to wane. So always put the best ministers up front to do the briefings. And make sure they are fully briefed. Most are doing as well as can be expected in the circumstances.
The most repeated questions are around PPE and testing. We have been assured repeatedly that testing will be 100,000 a day by end of April - that was the government commitment. I think it reasonable then for us to know how well things are progressing towards that commitment. We are currently at 25,000 a day. The government briefing tells us every day of the current number, but it is I think reasonable then to ask the question about the gap.
Very emotive Dr. talking/appealing/bemoaning on BBC this morning talking about a lack of PPE. I, for one, [Bold] am sick of hearing this constant criticism on the subject [/Bold]and would be interested if for once they showed the opposite perspective as it is out there. Have a driver like @Fish tell the country about the deliveries made where the last delivery of PPE hasn't even been opened. Let the public know the full story about this issue and how the NHS are deailing with it...not just have a go at the government.