Yes - I thought Corbyn did OK - and better than Johnson - but that is only because Johnson was so utterly dire...at times rambling and ranting almost incoherently as the words came tumbling out of his mouth and he gesticulated right, left and centre. Our Prime Minster?
Having viewed Johnson's performances yesterday his brother must have reflected on things overnight and reached the conclusion that he has.
So one might reasonably deduce that JJs thinking was that it wasn't such a great performance...
And as I said, that's your opinion. I didn't think Johnson was as bad as you say - "utterly dire..." That's your opinion.
Did Johnson's brother make the decision based on Johnson's performances or on political differences? And that one single sentence highlights your bias. You don't know do you....? You've deduced something from a starting position that isn't neutral. C'mon Hugh, you know as a PM that you break everything down to its starting point. Johnson isn't to be trusted but you can only have a weather eye based on mistrust. You have to rely on evidence of what happens now, not what might happen.