Robobum
Money List Winner
Congratulations to our new TT2's Champions of 2012, Paul Llewellyn & James Voce!
I'll leave that with you
I'll leave that with you
I watched it last night. I seen that they were expecting birdie on one of the playoff holes, I thought they were joking at first but they seemed deadly serious. The 2 Irish fellas they were playing against looked quite amazed that they made the final
the difference between professional amateurs and amateurs could clearly be seen with the contrast in that final (well the whole event really).
How has someone not picked up on these cheaters, or do they just turn a blind eye?
As long as they're full with entrants then I suppose they aren't bothered
How has someone not picked up on these cheaters, or do they just turn a blind eye?
Not saying i disagree with you Richy but just a heads up , this is a public forum & there is a possability stuff written here could be used if the person saw it and was agrieved .. Maybe be a bit more careful or vague with the words you use .. just a thought tho thats all ..
I think that they are fully aware of the situation. But they simply choose to ignore it
Paul Llewellyn's current listed handicap is 5.9 but it was 12.7 back in July 2011 and 10.0 in early August 2012 and 7.8 late August (25th) so maybe his away matches and accomplishments haven't been looked at by his club as they have only cut him 2.7 in over a year after winning some (very few entered) home competitions during 2011/2012.
Surely if you won a major amateur competition during that period, not once but twice and then also a National 2's, your club should look at the handicap, and not only adjust it from the minimum amount of comps played at the home club.
Being new to the game, I gather from reading the posts regarding the Trilby Tour that it is full of players with much higher handicaps than their playing ability, is that correct?
Why not place a caveat that all entrants should have had to of played in no less than 6 or 8 qualifying rounds at their home club in the last 12 months. That's not many IMO with weekend medals, midweek medals, board comps etc.
It would seem by what I looked into that very few home qualifying comps are entered into as those that succeed in major comps were too busy gallivanting around the country winning opens and National comps!
How can you win such a large National comp off 13 one year and then be playing the following year in it off only a 2.7 reduction!
Doesn't look or seem quite right at face value to me.
Why not place a caveat that all entrants should have had to of played in no less than 6 or 8 qualifying rounds at their home club in the last 12 months. That's not many IMO with weekend medals, midweek medals, board comps etc.
It would seem by what I looked into that very few home qualifying comps are entered into as those that succeed in major comps were too busy gallivanting around the country winning opens and National comps!
How can you win such a large National comp off 13 one year and then be playing the following year in it off only a 2.7 reduction!
Doesn't look or seem quite right at face value to me.