• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

AND HERE WE GO - THE 2019 GENERAL ELECTION THREAD

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 18645
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh yes, a very even-handed editorial. Looks like Labour have been the guardian angels of the ecconomy. How wrong we have been and thanks for trawling out that unquestionable crock for our education.

Its amazing how good you could be with the economy when someone has sorted out your mess... No doubt some apologist will jump all over it and say something completely different.
 
Oh yes, a very even-handed editorial. Looks like Labour have been the guardian angels of the ecconomy. How wrong we have been and thanks for trawling out that unquestionable crock for our education.
Please see post #2272.
 
Please see post #2272.
And whats that to do with anything? It doesn't make you immune from having your posts commented on. It's not just you but a number of members who keep posting links to editorials that they think rubbishes the Conservatives, most of them are just biased editorials that give someone else's subjective opinions, its just a lazy way of debating a subject, anyone can trawl the net and find some link to an editorial that supports their view, whatever it is. If you post a link then use it to support some of your own thoughts on a subject.
 
And whats that to do with anything? It doesn't make you immune from having your posts commented on. It's not just you but a number of members who keep posting links to editorials that they think rubbishes the Conservatives, most of them are just biased editorials that give someone else's subjective opinions, its just a lazy way of debating a subject, anyone can trawl the net and find some link to an editorial that supports their view, whatever it is. If you post a link then use it to support some of your own thoughts on a subject.

Would suggest both sides of the debate could be accused of laziness by posting biased editorials with no or little added comment...
 
Rejected the claims in the report, then admits he hasn’t read it! ?


This could be the most significant leaked document of the campaign
http://news.sky.com/story/this-coul...cant-leaked-document-of-the-campaign-11879552
First, how can Corbyn make a 'restricted doccument' public without infringing the secrets act.
Second, the text he is using is full of 'may' 'likely to' and 'could'
Lets give the Government a chance to comment before wetting ourselves with excitement ?
 
The big interview....

AN... What are going to do about the rising number of stabbings?
BJ... It's all Labour's fault.
AN... We will take that as a given. But, what are you intentending to do about it?
BJ... Let's get Brexit done!

Rinse and repeat for any other relevant questions the electorate would like a response for...
 
Last edited:
And whats that to do with anything? It doesn't make you immune from having your posts commented on. It's not just you but a number of members who keep posting links to editorials that they think rubbishes the Conservatives, most of them are just biased editorials that give someone else's subjective opinions, its just a lazy way of debating a subject, anyone can trawl the net and find some link to an editorial that supports their view, whatever it is. If you post a link then use it to support some of your own thoughts on a subject.
See post #3063
 
First, how can Corbyn make a 'restricted doccument' public without infringing the secrets act.
Second, the text he is using is full of 'may' 'likely to' and 'could'
Lets give the Government a chance to comment before wetting ourselves with excitement ?
See post #3063
 
First, how can Corbyn make a 'restricted doccument' public without infringing the secrets act.
Second, the text he is using is full of 'may' 'likely to' and 'could'
Lets give the Government a chance to comment before wetting ourselves with excitement ?

...and when the Treasury analysis is found to be valid and that Johnson is telling lies...? No doubt some will still find some 'whatabootery' to try and deflect, and find some excuses for the charlatan...it's utterly depressing...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top