robinthehood
Hacker
Not in the context you want it to be.But true
Sad.
Not in the context you want it to be.But true
Not in the context you want it to be.
Sad.
That's more project bs
"I've never met the IRA." - photographic evidence.
"I didn't lay a wreath at the grave of 4 terrorists that killed Israeli athletes." Photographic evidence - and some great footage on a piece by the Beeb.
"The Labour Party has investigated every single case of antisemitism." (from last night's debate) - A Labour councillor has today said there are over 100 cases still to be investigated.
"The Tories will sell off the NHS and do deals with big Pharma in the USA." Well, where's the proof of the first bit? But he is right on the second bit. The Tories have very recently signed a deal that sees the cost of cystic fibrosis meds come down massively.
They're both big liars, and arguing the size of the lie is just silly. The idea is to have a PM that you can trust... neither of them pass that benchmark.
I cant be arsed to go through each and every one of those allegations. I admit some of it smacks of exaggerated comments we hear from many politicians but much of it is also tittle tattle and nit picking. For example, he was prevented from allowing the UK leaving the EU at the end of October by the Benn Bill and the actions of Remainers in parliament, did he actually have to commit suicide in a ditch because of the way he had been manipulated. His claim that stopping the UK leaving would cost the country 1 billion pounds a month was maybe not exact but the general premise was correct as delaying our final leave date will add extra payments into the EU.You've got one.
How about we will be leaving on 31st October 'I'd be dead in a ditch' - no ifs not buts. He knew that he couldn't guarantee that - but he still insisted on saying it when Hunt and such as Stewart were saying to his face that he couldn't guarantee it, and whenever he was subsequently pressed on it.
Or what about his current 'parliament has blocked me getting a deal done'. Not true. Parliament passed the first reading of his agreed Withdrawal Agreement. Johnson then decided to pull it and call a General Election. We know why he did it - but parliament did not block it.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-50145265
But in case you don't believe that one here's Full Fact on another - the monthly payment to the EU
https://fullfact.org/europe/one-billion-a-month/
And the text from Full Fact on another - the border question
Does the new withdrawal agreement create a border in the Irish Sea?
It has been argued that the new withdrawal agreement will create a “border down the Irish Sea†with checks taking place on goods crossing into Northern Ireland from Great Britain.
It’s correct that goods checks will have to take place. This will kick in at the end of the transition period, unless or until the UK and EU sign a trade agreement superseding it. The transition period would last until December 2020 at the earliest, or at the latest December 2022.
And what about the standard line to the UK public - I will Get Brexit Done in 2020 and Labour will have two referendum
To the non-Scottish electorate is this a Lie; a Deceit, or a misinformation? I dunno - you choose. And in any case I don't actually believe that Labour have committed to a 2020 Scottish independence referendum
But just in case you don't consider any of these as Big Ls - here's the Independent newspaper historical take on Mr Johnson.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...te-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html
bs of the highest order and your lapping it up.Mind reader now then, perhaps the context might be if we are out of the EU the business that pays his wages would be minus the grants that help pay his wages.
But your the mind reader.
Meanwhile Diane Abbott continues to be insulted on here and the silence to her name calling is deafening.![]()
Why do you think she can’t? Very bright well educated woman who’s made a few gaffs over the years.Seriously Paul, do you think she could hold the position of Home Secretary in Government?
Why do you think she can’t? Very bright well educated woman who’s made a few gaffs over the years.
Going on the rule of thumb on here for boris she’s more than qualified.
Seriously Paul, do you think she could hold the position of Home Secretary in Government?
Absolutely, Cambridge educated, MP for over 30 years, increased her majority at last GE.Seriously ?
Why bring race in to it? Why not simply judge her as a public servant.Someone will play the race card soon 😂
Sorry I wanted to highlight being innumerate did not just affect stats but could be an issue in every day life .. like catching a bus. 😉.Meanwhile Diane Abbott continues to be insulted on here and the silence to her name calling is deafening.![]()
Absolutely, Cambridge educated, MP for over 30 years, increased her majority at last GE.
I fully recognise she’s made some public gaffes, but I ask again, what it is that makes boris anymore trustworthy as PM.
His background is full of embarrassing lies and gaffes yet we are asked not to be lazy when mentioning him.
Abbott is constantly undermined by the media and the mud thrown at her has stuck.
Nice to see you still maintaining your neutral position.I don't remember you defending Johnson or Rees Mogg from the name calling on here.
Just for you.....
View attachment 28597
Sorry I wanted to highlight being innumerate did not just affect stats but could be an issue in every day life .. like catching a bus. 😉.
But I am sure she is in a safe place and I am sure her constituency are happy with her efforts and they will show this by giving her a majority.
In the end that is the yard pole for all of these politicians.