Maybe she was feeling sorry for Stephen Kinnock and wanted to share some of the stupid burden with him? A pathetic attempt to turn this into some form of class issue.
Which is fine if they don't have to drive to do it...Not 100% certain about this but I believe the 'right to roam' in Scotland allows you do this provided you do not cause damage or interfere with the activity [eg harvest/shooting etc]
I would imagine that many Scots will be taking advantage of that.
This quite different to what she is suggesting, to me anyway. A number of the courses up by me have public footpaths through them and golfers and walkers generally co-habit very reasonably, as you indicate. This is more a free for all approach. If people are misinterpreting then let us hope she comes back and clarifies her comments.Going to suggest many courses have public footpaths passing through... I've walked around St Andrews, of an evening, without playing...
This quite different to what she is suggesting, to me anyway. A number of the courses up by me have public footpaths through them and golfers and walkers generally co-habit very reasonably, as you indicate. This is more a free for all approach. If people are misinterpreting then let us hope she comes back and clarifies her comments.
Alternatively she could just be the chip on her shoulder, irresponsible pillock I currently think she is.
We could let some of these morons sunbathing in the park into the safari parks .
Would be some exercise for the big cats.
If the courses are closed what's the problem? Thought we were in this together?
Many courses are in urban areas so would allow locals ample area for walking near to home whilst maintaining 2m separation.
Is it not elitism, selfish and private club mentality to say no without consideration at least in unprecedented times?
Fence off the greens to people and good to go.
St Andrews Old has been mentioned as open Sundays to walkers (as it's closed Sundays) but at my old club all the kids use hilly parts of it in winter for sledging -goodwill created.
Is the fear that once this is over people would continue to walk there, it opens a can of worms? Or do members fear damage being done?
Their lives possibly if they work in public transport and NHS.?Having had a member whose house backs onto the course already turf 3 teenagers playing football off a green, and having previously been a member at a course on common land where cyclists & motorcyclists went out of their way to ride over greens I'll decline your kind offer if it's all the same to you.
As we're all in this together, what are those who aren't members of golf courses giving up to benefit golfers living near them?