A question for you.

TheJezster

Tour Rookie
Joined
Jan 5, 2011
Messages
1,510
Location
Surrey
Visit site
Wow, complicated...

How about you just put it down to a lapse of judgement and carry on as you were ;-)

Hole halved in match play (if it was) etc

So much easier!
 

jim8flog

Journeyman Pro
Joined
May 20, 2017
Messages
15,890
Location
Yeovil
Visit site
Wow, complicated...

How about you just put it down to a lapse of judgement and carry on as you were ;-)

Hole halved in match play (if it was) etc

So much easier!
because playing by the rules avoids arguments that might not have the correct outcome in the long run.

"Lets halve the hole" "no" says the weaker character. The stronger character badgers him in to submission because the weaker character does not want to cause a fuss etc etc

"lets play it as a halved match says the guy who would have lost the hole " not knowing any better " ok" says the guy who would have won the hole. He later finds out that he would have won the hole and hence the match etc etc as he seeks redress
 

Colin L

Tour Winner
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
5,370
Location
Edinburgh
Visit site
Wow, complicated...

How about you just put it down to a lapse of judgement and carry on as you were ;-)

Hole halved in match play (if it was) etc

So much easier!

As I said (I think), it is much easier in match play. The first player to play a wrong ball loses the hole. Doesn't come much simpler.
The complication in stroke play is that one played a wrong ball and the other an incorrectly substituted ball. What each had to do next after the mistakes had been discovered was different.
 

Colin L

Tour Winner
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
5,370
Location
Edinburgh
Visit site
Surely the ball that was substituted in the relief situation is no longer a wrongly substituted ball, it is simply being played from a wrong place 14-7 rather than 6.3?

I've just remembered I was going to come back to this. This is how I see it.

B's action in lifting and dropping the other ball did not actually relate to taking relief ; it related to his ball in play which at the time of his lifting the ball from the temporary green was on the main green where it had been put by A. Where he picked up the other ball from doesn't matter and its being on a temporary green is only relevant in that it caused B to lift and drop it rather than play it - an incorrect substitution rather than a wrong ball. B made a stroke at an incorrectly substituted ball in breach of Rule 6.3b(3), got a 2 stroke penalty and had to continue with the substituted ball, his original ball now being out of play.

An incorrect substitution might be made in the correct place or in a wrong place. If in a wrong place, that is a secondary consideration and covered by reference to 1.3c(4) which explicitly deals with an incorreclty substituted ball that is played from a wrong place, confirming that there is a 2 stroke penalty in total.
 
Last edited:

duncan mackie

Money List Winner
Joined
Feb 19, 2012
Messages
11,136
Visit site
I've just remembered I was going to come back to this. This is how I see it.

B's action in lifting and dropping the other ball did not actually relate to taking relief ; it related to his ball in play which at the time of his lifting the ball from the temporary green was on the main green where it had been put by A. Where he picked up the other ball from doesn't matter and its being on a temporary green is only relevant in that it caused B to lift and drop it rather than play it - an incorrect substitution rather than a wrong ball. B made a stroke at an incorrectly substituted ball in breach of Rule 6.3b(3), got a 2 stroke penalty and had to continue with the substituted ball, his original ball now being out of play.

An incorrect substitution might be made in the correct place or in a wrong place. If in a wrong place, that is a secondary consideration and covered by reference to 1.3c(4) which explicitly deals with an incorreclty substituted ball that is played from a wrong place, confirming that there is a 2 stroke penalty in total.
Thank you for the well reasoned explanation
 

backwoodsman

Tour Winner
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
7,008
Location
sarf Lunnon
Visit site
I've just remembered I was going to come back to this. This is how I see it.

B's action in lifting and dropping the other ball did not actually relate to taking relief ; it related to his ball in play which at the time of his lifting the ball from the temporary green was on the main green where it had been put by A. Where he picked up the other ball from doesn't matter and its being on a temporary green is only relevant in that it caused B to lift and drop it rather than play it - an incorrect substitution rather than a wrong ball. B made a stroke at an incorrectly substituted ball in breach of Rule 6.3b(3), got a 2 stroke penalty and had to continue with the substituted ball, his original ball now being out of play.

An incorrect substitution might be made in the correct place or in a wrong place. If in a wrong place, that is a secondary consideration and covered by reference to 1.3c(4) which explicitly deals with an incorreclty substituted ball that is played from a wrong place, confirming that there is a 2 stroke penalty in total.

Aahh haaa! So the wrong green was a red herring after all.

If I'm reading Colin's above correctly, why he picked it up seems not revelvant - just that he did pick it up, then dropped it and played a stroke at it. . The fact he thought he was doing the correct thing on a temp green is neither here nor there. Could have been any ball, anywhere on the course?
 

Colin L

Tour Winner
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
5,370
Location
Edinburgh
Visit site
I'll defend my saying it wasn't a red herring ;) . Yes, in terms of my incorrectly substituting a ball it didn't matter where I got the ball from - somewhere on the course, my pocket, my bag - but it was only because the ball was on the temporary green that I lifted it in the first place. Otherwise I would have just played it. It made the difference between a wrong ball and an incorrectly substituted one.

What it doesn't make a difference to is that the person who always marks his ball very carefully and checks it before playing and pontificates on this very forum about the importance of doing so, put his brain into reverse and had to pay a 2 stroke penalty for proving that he is a senior. :rolleyes:
 
Top