Swinglowandslow's latest activity

The host of twaddle over Christmas of cr*p programmes that had the word "Celebriity" as the prefix that left me asking "Sorry, who the...

🕶🎶 "Since my memory left me I found a new place to dwell It's down the end of.............. Oh bugger!"

Chuck it. Not worth the risk of getting upset tummy for a cup of milk. Me and my Mrs had same conversation yesterday about left-over...

Thanks. I think lighter is better at my age. You wouldn’t believe the difference in strength going from 60 yrs to 80yrs. But I’m not...

Thank you very much for the advices given. I have now found out about something called “ swing weight” Research reveals the SW for my...

Guilty, m’Lord! But , in my experience, I have often found that’ Brevity is the mother of all cockups’ Bill was a bit optimistic😀

In my reading of it, it wasn’t …it was clear as far as it went, but to my reading it didn’t cover conditions underfoot - but there you...

Hmmpf. Mines up to date and I don’t get one. There’s an injustice right there. 😂

The words I made bold from your post, I.e. the end ones…yes they aren’t in 16(1)c “for the ball” were already bold in your post. Must...

I’m not going to flog this, but I’ve just read 16(1)c and the bold words are not in it. So, they are the words of the poster- fair...

These wet winters are likely to be a problem for me. I can carry ( 4 or 5 clubs) for nine holes. I can’t walk 18, even with a trolley...

Those words are the posters, it is the question about the nature of the stance which SILH queried, I.e. could it afford a way to better...

…since you are making the point I might suggest that ‘regardless of where the stance is’ is ambiguous, as it can be read to refer to...

Cor Blimey😀! Course it does address the issue. That’s what we’ve been addressing, much to KenL’s irritation 😀. It goes like this…..you...

Exactly. In my post 94 I point out ( re his second paragraph) to SILH that he’s got the relief the wrong way round. The relief is taken...