Women's tennis

shanker

Q-School Graduate
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
884
Location
Spain
Visit site
What a joke! Nadal and Verdasco spend 5 hours on the court to settle their semi-final in Melbourne. Nadal still has Federer in the final. Meanwhile, Miss Williams strolls past her ''opponent'' to win the girls' final in 58 minutes. She will pocket more cash than tomorrow's loser. Ridiculous!
 

Imurg

The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
37,702
Location
Aylesbury Bucks
Visit site
They should only get the same if the match potentially lasts the same length of time.

I know the men have been paid more for years but they do sometimes have to go to 5 sets. The girls never play more than 3. What happened to equality.

And well done to laura Robson even though she lost in the final. She should be a great hope for Grand Slams in a few years time.
 

USER1999

Grand Slam Winner
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
25,671
Location
Watford
Visit site
I don't get why the women still play 3 sets. It isn't like they are weak and feable. Serena is bigger and stronger than me. She looks way capable of a 5 setter.

Equal money should come with equal entertainment.
 

medwayjon

Tour Winner
Joined
Aug 22, 2007
Messages
4,594
Location
Chatham, Kent.
www.snodhurstcarsales.co.uk
Equal prize money for ladies is PC madness.

They cried about the sexism and all that which we know is a load of shite.

The men play longer games so should get more cash, simple.

If someone does a 2 hour shift and someone 4 the man who does 4 would get paid more so why not in tennis.
 
Top