User20205
Money List Winner
Some forms of anchored strokes are currently legal - others aren't. The argument is about a forthcoming rule change which (allegedly) will have an adverse effect on some players. Rules are changed and reviewed on many occasions - not just about equipment (e.g. ball size and weight, grooves and CoR of drivers) but all other rules. In other words, at some point a method of play or procedure is conforming and after review, it isn't. For the reasons outlined (you can read it yourself at the R&A website) anchored putting will cease to be conforming in the future. There is a clause currently in the rules (rule 14) which allows equipment to be used by medical exemption, but this must be transparent and proven. Tim Clark's case falls short of this, simply because the other 13 clubs in his bag do not carry the same perceived disadvantage when the ruling is applied. Remember the "level playing field" part? He either has medical condition which allows exemption, or he doesn't. I'm not a doctor, but I can see he is being rather selective about his condition - and I would think the ruling bodies would agree. Nice try Tim, but get back to work.
I've just skim read it cheers, and I accept your point re the groove rule change and Clark's potential use of a medical exemption. It's old ground but there is nothing in the rules that currently outlaws anchoring & I believe that prematurely ending the careers of some pros & potentially ruining the enjoyment of thousands of recreational golfers is wrong IMO.
And what for, just because 3 fellas won majors and a few college kids use a long putter.