HogansAlley
Assistant Pro
I don't think he could ban them from covering steroid abuse as it would be deemed in the public interest.
Public interest it may be but you must have reliable sources or some evidence.
I don't think he could ban them from covering steroid abuse as it would be deemed in the public interest.
I don't think he could ban them from covering steroid abuse as it would be deemed in the public interest.
Public interest it may be but you must have reliable sources or some evidence.
I don't think he could ban them from covering steroid abuse as it would be deemed in the public interest.
Public interest it may be but you must have reliable sources or some evidence.
That is what I meant if they had any evidence proper good evdence rather than this wild speculation, he couldn't close it down with an injunction. The Injuction must have been about something more personel.
I think this sums everything up
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/iaincarter/2009/12/finchem_stands_up_for_woods.html
I think this sums everything up
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/iaincarter/2009/12/finchem_stands_up_for_woods.html
Wow. The comments at the bottom make our Tiger fan boys look postively amateurish!
Salient point about Daly though. You have to ask what the distinction is between Daly and Woods as far as the PGA rules go.