I thought it was quite clear - nearest point and 1 club length for a free drop and 2 club lengths for a penalty drop. Is there something I've been missing?
i think its a grand idea to have tests associated to yoru handicap
I thought it was quite clear - nearest point and 1 club length for a free drop and 2 club lengths for a penalty drop. Is there something I've been missing?
unplayable.. not a hazzard tho ..option of 2 club lenghts not nearer the hole ..or think it called stroke & distance , you can go back as far as you like in the line of your ball & the flag .. if neither of these are an option you can go back to where you played your previous shot was played .. open to correction hereI thought it was quite clear - nearest point and 1 club length for a free drop and 2 club lengths for a penalty drop. Is there something I've been missing?
Whats the one where you have a one shot penalty but you can go back as far as you like, so long that you keep the hazard between you and the hole?
Was told this one a couple of years ago, went back about 50 yards on another fairway and then hit the ball over the tree to about 15 foot of the pin.
Tests are something you either pass or fail, the suggestion was a questionaire which is not a test something to be completed off Course where you can obtain the answers you don`t know from your rule book.
one replying said a similar method was already in use on the Continent so it must have some merit.
Its not really for those that know all the rules already just the other 95% of players.
Dont think that was the idea of the OP mayb im wrong, when you apply for membership & hand in your cards you fill out this questionarre rather than exam . you can bring it with you & fill it in at home after looking up the answers .. you are subconsiously learning basic rules & how to look up decisions in the rule book .... then you hand it in & get your membership & playing handicap activated .. you handicap is not based on an exam it will be determined on scores, the same as always .. when ya see the different understanding of shall we say basic rules even on here mayb this might not be such a bad idea after all..Haha that is quite funny, how on earth is testing people to get lower handicaps going to work. People moan about bandits as it is now. Can you imagine people would be failing tests so they remain at a 18 handicap rather than pass a test so they can go down to 12. You would have someone with a playing handicap and a knowledge handicap which could be different. Making people carry and use rule books would be a lot better rather than just a test as such.
one question i do have on your statement tho.. why should it be. or at least why should it be expexted that a single handicapper needs to have or should have better knowledge of the rules than a higher handicapper ?? should be same all over ..Upon acquiring 18 or less a further questionairre and when reaching single figures a more difficult set of questions.