D
Deleted member 18588
Guest
And to think I read through the list 3 times to be sure of not getting it wrong.
Not to excuse my sloppy reading, but only one in those 23 years? It still looks a bit lopsided.
I agree but people like Larry Nelson and Andy North perhaps made it difficult for the journo' by somehow winning more than one.
Anyway I still feel that these reviews are subjective and, thus, pointless. An American chooses to include Paul Lawrie whilst a Brit might say Justin Leonard and yet each was the best player in that particular week. Nobody can ever take that away from them.
When I played cricket a member of my own team once described a ton I scored as "rather streaky", my reply; "just look in the score book". That is how the players listed will, I am sure, respond to this article.