Mudball
Assistant Pro
No, they really don't.
The old FIT scheme (which is still operational, of course) is a poorly thought out way to move money from the poor to the rich. Everyone pays a supplement on their electricity bill to cover the FIT payments given to those who could afford to install a system. (I speak as someone who had such a system on the top FIT rate until we moved in 2021).
The last thing we need now is to encourage massive amounts of PV that produce power during the daytime in summer when it's not needed, at least not unless there's a way to store it. We should now be encouraging ways to balance demand, ie. installing storage systems and shifting demand to overnight. Unfortunately at present all the easily available battery systems depend on rare materials such as lithium and cobalt. Driving a move towards less environmentally damaging storage systems (eg. flow batteries, gravity batteries in old mine shafts, etc) is where the focus should be.
not sure i understand this.. if anything, we need more help so that more people can put PVs on their roof. Micro generation is the way forward and avoids making massive investments in large new power generation projects. As we know, we have not been the best in bringing new power plant in a cost effective way... Hinkley has been going on for ever. No new fossil fuel power plants. We have yet to figure out way to what to do with nuclear waste. In the meanwhile, the demand is going up. So the q is how we plug this gap. PV + battery is the way forward. I completely agree with you that we need a way to increase storage (aka battery) rather than direct feed ins.
Subsidy is the way forward and should not been seen as taking from poor to give to rich. Otherwise as a car driver, i should start complaining that i pay road tax which bikers are using for free.