chrisd
Major Champion
Distance hasn't been a problem, I know when I've hit a bad putt and I'm fine with that. What irks me is hitting putts on the line you've picked and it's wrong from the start.
Aimpoint is all about getting the line right! :thup:
Distance hasn't been a problem, I know when I've hit a bad putt and I'm fine with that. What irks me is hitting putts on the line you've picked and it's wrong from the start.
do an Aimpoint course with Jamie Donaldson - it helped me no end!
Chris please don't put this idea in his head....he's slow enough as it is with his 4 practice swings 😪😪😪😪
What's the alternative, 4 putt like you 😉
Aimpoint is all about getting the line right! :thup:
I've never experienced Aim point but I can't imagine how it would work, although I don't doubt it helps some people.
I think that, in general, most folk don't allow for enough borrow. Watching the European Tour yesterday even the pros miss more putts on the low side. What I find helps is to "see" the putt in my mind's eye going into the hole, breaking more & more as it reaches the hole. I then make my point of aim a point level with the hole on the line that I have imagined. This usually results in allowing more borrow than originally envisaged. Remember, if you miss low side by 1" you're around 4" out in reality. It surprises me sometimes when the pros miss by this much.
I don't think Aimpoint is for me, I've tried standing on a big slope to get the feel but can only just about tell that there is a slope there, let alone how severe or not it is.
Must be some sort of spider sense that I don't have.
If I gave you a 150yds into a green And you'd never played golf before, would you know what club you would need to get it there?
AimPoint has been great for me. However, I would like to point out that usually there is no such thing as "bad green reading but good putting" etc. The two are correlated.
When someone complains about bad green reading but good putting, usually the green reading is bad because the quality of the putting stroke is bad. If distance control is inconsistent (which is the problem for 99% of us) then green reading will always be poor as the same putt will always have different amounts of break. Without proper distance control, green reading tends to be of little help.
So yeah, by all means go and do an Aimpoint class, but you will probably save more strokes by getting a putting lesson and buying a putting mat to work on technique over the winter.
Yes. But what I'm saying also is that just like anything it takes practice. In the same way reading a green normally does.
I still don't think it's for me but I'm intrigued, do you practice standing on varying slopes and over time you develop a sense of feel for the slope through your feet?
And how long does it take to develop that feel?
I still don't think it's for me but I'm intrigued, do you practice standing on varying slopes and over time you develop a sense of feel for the slope through your feet?
And how long does it take to develop that feel?
Multiple ways to learn it, I have built myself a slope board that I stand on at home sometimes to 'feel' the slope, and I also have a digital spirit level which I use on the practice green and practice rounds to check I've got it right.
I don't won't knock anyone for not wanting to do it, but those whose criticise (not suggesting you have at all) without learning it are grossly misinformed
yes, it's just like being taught a new take away, or downswing, you go and practise until it becomes second nature. So how long depends how much you practise it?
Multiple ways to learn it, I have built myself a slope board that I stand on at home sometimes to 'feel' the slope, and I also have a digital spirit level which I use on the practice green and practice rounds to check I've got it right.
Sam, still confused by this ......surely if you put down a spirit level on your intended line, then moved it forward a few feet you will get a different reading and what about pace - wouldn't a slope closer to the hole have a greater impact than one a few feet in front of your? Earlier someone suggested multiple "readings" but I don't see people doing that much.
The talk about measuring like this intrigues me, but am struggling to understand how it can be converted into an almost mechanically sounding exercise despite the multiple variables involved.
Sam, still confused by this ......surely if you put down a spirit level on your intended line, then moved it forward a few feet you will get a different reading and what about pace - wouldn't a slope closer to the hole have a greater impact than one a few feet in front of your? Earlier someone suggested multiple "readings" but I don't see people doing that much.
The talk about measuring like this intrigues me, but am struggling to understand how it can be converted into an almost mechanically sounding exercise despite the multiple variables involved.