More Rangers woe...

[thecraw]

I thought you might have Chris. Can I ask why or is it only allowed to have a dig at the bears on this forum?

Meeeeaaoooooooooooooooooowl.

 

[chris661]

I thought you might have Chris. Can I ask why or is it only allowed to have a dig at the bears on this forum?

You can and IMO that was not necessary or particularly tasteful.

 

[Dodger]

You can and IMO that was not necessary or particularly tasteful.

Don't know what he said but go easy Chris,they are hurting badly.Poor souls.:rofl::whoo:

 

[Andy]

You can and IMO that was not necessary or particularly tasteful.

Was John's slur necessary? Obviously since it wasn't deleted.

I bet it wasnt tasteful at the time for you know who but you cant change history.

We might be skint but we have a clear conscious.

 

[chris661]

Was John's slur necessary? Obviously since it wasn't deleted.

I bet it wasnt tasteful at the time for you know who but you cant change history.

We might be skint but we have a clear conscious.

By John I am assuming you mean 2004champ? Forgive me for not knowing everyones names. Have Rangers not been fined for sectarian chanting and been found guilty by the SFA for cheating which only match fixing was deemed to be worse? Must have misheard the radio on that one.

Yes Andy, child abuse is a great thing to use to score points isn't it? I don't know you and frankly if you are resorting to using child abuse as a cheap way to score points then I don't think I want to know you all that well either if that is your mentality. Just dropped way down in my estimation I am afraid.

 

[bladeplayer]

Didnt see the post but sounds like you were on the ball & did the right thing Chris , im not or dont wana be a mod but maybe its time to lock & leave this thread .. anyone DISagree

 

[Mungoscorner]

"No Bloodstained Poppy On Our Hoops" ?
Aye,thats the height of good taste.

 

[Val]

It's getting a bit silly guys, best lock this thread Chris