"If"

[kid2]

And this is hypothetically speaking which would you choose if the money wasnt and issue.......

Titleists 910 range or TM's RBZ range of woods.....

Only these two though.....
I think that the Titleists would keep their value a little better than the TM's....

But the TM's maybe considerably more user friendly....After witnessing first hand what both can do.
I think that i may be swayed more towards the TM's.....

 

[garyinderry]

the 910's looks better on the eye to me. im sure they are both fine sets of sticks.

next time i am in the markets for hybrids im am going to go down the ADAMS route. spotted some in american golf and they really caught my eye. pricey though!

 

[Phil2511]

Titleist Driver and Rescues. But not their fairway woods. Tried both and bought Titleist. Found them very easy to hit tbh.

 

[hackerjack99]

The TM's are lovely clubs but if money wasn't an issue I would find it hard not to pick the beautiful 910's. Having hit both I would have to say the r11's are much easier to hit but not as easy to shape. For me it wold have to be the 910's.

 

[shewy]

As per my sig Titleist all day long, tried both but quite frankly TM shafts are complete mince.

 

[chrisd]

Only these two though.....
I think that the Titleists would keep their value a little better than the TM's....

But the TM's maybe considerably more user friendly....After witnessing first hand what both can do.
I think that i may be swayed more towards the TM's.....

I don't agree that the TM's are more user friendly, I personally hit the Titleist better than any of the TM's I have tried. Having said that, the TM's would not hve necessarily been set up correctly for me and you will only really know by having a fitting on any club you fancy.

Wth changeable heads and shafts, comparing clubs is nigh on impossible without a fitting

 

[One Planer]

As per my sig Titleist all day long, tried both but quite frankly TM shafts are complete mince.

This ^

Totally agree that the stock shafts in most TM woods are pants.

 

[duncan mackie]

they will both work - get the ones you want.

 

[Alex1975]

Ttleist

 

[JustOne]

RBZ's.

Every Titleist club I've hit carries too much back spin..... I think it's so the choppers can keep it on the fairway.

 

[One Planer]

To be honest, I don't like either.

If I had to choose I would say Titleist. Purely for the re-sale value

 

[JustOne]

If I had to choose I would say Titleist. Purely for the re-sale value

Ha! That's what I was thinking about the RBZ's.... I reckon you could shift an RBZ driver if you didn't get on with it easier than a Titty 910.

 

[One Planer]

Ha! That's what I was thinking about the RBZ's.... I reckon you could shift an RBZ driver if you didn't get on with it easier than a Titty 910.

Hmmm maybe.

The other thing what swung me the Titleist route is the shaft choice you get with the 910 range.

You have to admit. The stock shafts in TM, even the RBZ are, well, not great?

 

[Monty_Brown]

The Titties are undoubtedly great clubs but the fact is that not all clubs suit all players, so any preference is only hypothetical until you hit them.

I tested the 910 range when I was buying a driver and 3 wood and just could not get them to work for me in a range of shaft options.

 

[HawkeyeMS]

I think my sig says it all