Liam1984
Medal Winner
Are they worth invested in or a gimmick
What model would you recommendVery popular as they give simple information , simple to user and relatively priced well
Certainyl well worth it if looking for a GPS item to give you distance info
What model would you recommend
CheersAt the moment the Golf Buddy WT4 is the best value watch out there IMO, I'm going on looks and amount of accurate, relevant data without the need for a subscription. Build quality is superb and it's stupidly simple to use, definitely worth a serious consideration if I were in your boots.
At the moment the Golf Buddy WT4 is the best value watch out there IMO, I'm going on looks and amount of accurate, relevant data without the need for a subscription. Build quality is superb and it's stupidly simple to use, definitely worth a serious consideration if I were in your boots.
I have been using a WT4 after winning it in a draw at my club. I have found it to be excellent. You can get all sorts of hazard distance data but I tend to stay with the basics. The only problem is if you stray from the fairway you should be on. The gps then swaps to that hole if you are looking for a ball for a while. You then have to tell it to go back to the hole you want. That is minor though and others may do the same.
I received it just as my sky caddies battery failed and I do miss the bigger screen but the watch is just a bit more convenient sat on my wrist.
People keep mentioning [accuracy], if that is key then where you play and how much you play at various other courses means there should only be 1 choice, a SkyCaddie, because we (yes I work for them) have visited and updated over 250 courses this term so far and will continue to visit courses when informed of changes that require addressing, anything else in your hand or on your wrist is simply out of date and could be for many years as it only relies on Ariel imagery that's updated by a third party, which those companies as mentioned above have no control on, and before anyone says it, there are many devices in the SkyCaddie range that do not require a subscription, but for what I see people spending on here, an annual fee for guaranteed accuracy for wherever you may play in the world is a small price to pay, IMHO.
For some people maybe Robin but it isn't enough of a draw for me to carry on paying my subscription....
I'm another with a GolfBuddy WT4 watch and I really like it, does exactly what I need I to.
As I clearly stated, if you play at a small number of local courses all the time and if they haven't had any significant changes, then you can afford to have something that isn't religiously updated on an ongoing basis. If you play new courses and travel around a bit, then having something that's potentially inaccurate is pointless IMO.
I do travel around and play.
I still have my eyes
I'm more interested in yardages when going for the green, rarely look at distance of things off the tee so makes small difference to me.
I get that's Skycaddies selling point and fair to play to you as it seems a lot of effort goes into accuracy just not enough benefit for me to justify paying a yearly charge.
People keep mentioning [accuracy], if that is key then where you play and how much you play at various other courses means there should only be 1 choice, a SkyCaddie, because we (yes I work for them) have visited and updated over 250 courses this term so far and will continue to visit courses when informed of changes that require addressing, anything else in your hand or on your wrist is simply out of date and could be for many years as it only relies on Ariel imagery that's updated by a third party, which those companies as mentioned above have no control on, and before anyone says it, there are many devices in the SkyCaddie range that do not require a subscription, but for what I see people spending on here, an annual fee for guaranteed accuracy for wherever you may play in the world is a small price to pay, IMHO.