Hacker Khan
Yurt Dwelling, Yoghurt Knitter
No, the basic point I was making (although educating golfers IS important) is that I wanted to put shafts to the test from an amateur perspective. Take this example:
23 handicapper (sorry to pick on Cat 4s) goes for a fitting (like golfers are 'supposed' to), gets a nice pro behind him/her with his/her £10,000 trackman exclaiming, "Yup, that's the shot!", "Oh yeah, keep 'em there" etc and then uses the data to inform him/her as to whether to purchase the brand new Callaways (or other brand) with the £100 worth of shaft upgrades.
Why wouldn't he/she spend £800? The pro has shown the golfer that their dispersion has tightened by 10 yards with the 7 iron they were hitting compared to their old, say, Ping G15s. They are now flying 15 yards further as well! Happy days! During the testing they thought they'd found the right shaft (stiff, stock, which gave same distance gains but no improvement on dispersion) but after trying the Super Dooper Flash Bomb Mega Stick shafts (£100 up charge), they got the dispersion tightened as well.
So, it looks like the upgraded shafts are worth the extra cash, right? Distance gains and dispersion MUST be due to the shaft in the above example, yeah? Put your cynical head on and I bet you could list two dozen other factors to explain these results.
It's this cynicism that led to my OP. I have yet to see anyone PROPERLY control a fitting session to test the effects of different shafts. Funny that.
Upgrading shafts for a 23 handicapper is a utter waste of time as where you strike it on the head of the club makes so much more difference. I think Crossfield explains it very well in this and other videos
[video=youtube_share;N5Z5I8y-uQs]https://youtu.be/N5Z5I8y-uQs[/video]