Do clubs value visitors too much.

As others have said it seems an unusual club/course in terms of green fee as a visitor v subs.

I'm a grand a year membership but visitor fee is something like £75-£85 I think.

They are actively managing down the number if visitors and societies as membership is full though.
 
some courses are more membership friendly, Beau Desert for example have dedicated tee times for members only, visitors/guests are welcome but only at certain times. The club in question have a different business agenda, they look to fill all available tee slots be it members or pay and play, thus the cheaper visitor rate
 
I've just enquired about a course for membership next year. I've edited it to protect the identity of the course, which some of you may know already. They came back to me with the figures and I have replied with the following.

Hi , I've just done some number crunching and I play approx 45 times per year. On the Expensive course this is £30 per round. This works out to £1350. Now if I join the club and play 45 times it works out to £33.87 per round. 50% of which will be on the cheaper course. Unless I am getting my figures out you are essentially charging me more to play as a member than a visitor. I can't see the sense in this?

I genuinely want to join the club but I may as well pay and play if these are the best rates available?





Now I understand the benefits you get as a member I.e. Priority booking, an official handicap and the opportunity to play in comps but surely it should work out cheaper to be a member than just a visitor? I don't expect special introductory offers to a successful course but would expect some reward for loyalty?

I presume the majority of courses do work out cheaper as a member than visitor?

But don't you also get free use of the health club (including gym & swimming pool).
 
some courses are more membership friendly, Beau Desert for example have dedicated tee times for members only, visitors/guests are welcome but only at certain times. The club in question have a different business agenda, they look to fill all available tee slots be it members or pay and play, thus the cheaper visitor rate

The big difference there is Beau Desert is a private members club that is in demand for membership and is not a business looking to make a profit. The club the OP is looking at is proprietary and will always try and fill it's available slots which makes perfect business sense - hence the visitors rates.
 
I just did the sums for my club and, depending on whether you play weekends / weekdays, with or without a member, you'd need to play between about 26 & 35 times a year to "break even" so it does look like the green fees at your proposed club are low compared with membership fees. However, it's entirely up to the club as to what they charge and the low green fee is probably a reflection of how desperate the club is to bring in additional revenue and the local competition to attract itinerant golfers.

We have an ex member who can't play a lot. He comes up, sometimes weekly, and takes advantage of the lower "with member rate" I personally think this is wrong and that someone who plays regularly should either have to join or at least pay the full green fee. and he's a mate of mine, but I still think it's wrong.
 
Beau has made a loss 3 years running. Believe me they are trying to make a profit


Not really, a members' club will be looking to break even with perhaps a small profit for reserves.

After all if they need to make a significant profit that will generally be at the expense of the members.
 
The big difference there is Beau Desert is a private members club that is in demand for membership and is not a business looking to make a profit. The club the OP is looking at is proprietary and will always try and fill it's available slots which makes perfect business sense - hence the visitors rates.

Exactly. The question should surely be do the members value the club enough, and clearly they don't if the club is offering green fees at that rate to fill the slots. If there were enough members they wouldn't need to. And if the members don't value it enough, the next question is why?

I'm fortunate to be a member of a club that is valued by its members and therefore has sufficient to make it run without over-reliance, hence the weekend visitors green fee of £65, or £45 weekdays. It's nice to pick up a bit more cash from visitors and societies, but we don't want to overrun it with visitors to the detriment of the members so it is set high, unless you play as a member's guest.

£65 x 50 rounds, + £45 x 30 rounds = £4,6000, considerably more than the £1,600 I pay for annual membership.
 
Surely a club will set a membership rates based on the expected number of members and green fee/societies (and therefore a fixed income) minus expenditure. If there's a big project (drainage for example they may tag an increase per head onto membership costs. Never popular but sometimes a necessary evil. However what they don't do is sit down and figure that Joe Bloggs only played 17 games, mostly midweek while his mate played 113 including weekend and midweek and try and base a fee on that usage.

When you join you pay because you want the value added of being a member such as tee time priority (if you have that) comps, practice facilities, clubhouse facilities, social events etc. You are buying the package as a whole. If you aren't happy with that and think you're getting a raw deal then perhaps membership at that club, indeed at all may not be for you
 
They cant afford sand for bunkers. They need money

Well that will be at the expense of the existing members since there are no vacancies for Full Members. That is the objective of breaking even.

Are you sure that the Club cannot afford the sand or is this a bar rumour. Clubs are great breeding grounds for such things.
 
Well that will be at the expense of the existing members since there are no vacancies for Full Members. That is the objective of breaking even.

Are you sure that the Club cannot afford the sand or is this a bar rumour. Clubs are great breeding grounds for such things.

There are never vacancies for full membership. You have to be a 5 day member at first and apply for a 7 day after 2 years
 
There are never vacancies for full membership. You have to be a 5 day member at first and apply for a 7 day after 2 years

Unless you have played at county level then you can jump any waiting list and have 7 day membership. I looked to join when I was possibly moving out that way. Was told I had to pay as a 5 day member for 2 years even though I worked all week. I may have got a game some weekends if invited by a 7 day member.
 
Unless you have played at county level then you can jump any waiting list and have 7 day membership. I looked to join when I was possibly moving out that way. Was told I had to pay as a 5 day member for 2 years even though I worked all week. I may have got a game some weekends if invited by a 7 day member.

My best friend pretty much joined and didn't play for two years!!!! Thats some dosh
 
Surely they should make membership better value than visitor green fees for the average golfer? My current course certainly does.

Even if they did work it out on the average number of rounds (which they don't) you will always end up with some people getting better "value" than others.

The bottom line is you decide if you want to join a club and you decide if you can and want to pay the fees. Anything else is irrelevent.
 
Top