We will never get universal agreement as a group on TW. What I will say is that if you look at the scores posted by woods in his hey day, the amount of successive rounds under par etc, was it that the field was weak? Or he was just so much better? It happens in all sports. I've heard people question federer saying he was lucky with his tally of majors. Re the weaker fields for woods and how many people win majors these days. I had a look at the lists. During the 10 years from Woods first major win. There were 20'alternative major winners, some with multiple wins. So 2 different a year over 10 years. Since then, in 7 years there have been 18 winners. So 2.5 a year with no dominant player. Hardly a great or a signal of a new dominant field you suggest there is. I think TW woods lack of universal approval is due entirely to personality and not skill. Maybe with the advantage of time. People will, in 20 years revere him as they do others. But I think to belittle his skill as can be done. Is baseless when you look at his career.
...and when was Jacks last Major
:ears:
But I will take a box of your finest hot sweet popcorn Brendy while this develops into mayhem.
