Blue in Munich
Crocked Professional Yeti Impersonator
Cancelled our bookings for our second vaccines; I got a text immediately to let me know, Mrs BiM has got nothing. 
Cancelled our bookings for our second vaccines; I got a text immediately to let me know, Mrs BiM has got nothing.![]()
A lot better than it being ineffective!is a "vaccine" being 60% effective good news?
A lot better than it being ineffective!
0 sounds pretty ineffective to mine.60% sounds pretty ineffective to my maths
0 sounds pretty ineffective to mine.
so what level would you call effective? 1% as is its higher than 0?
I think that while we lay people might not see 60% as anything special, the scientific world of immunology regards 60% as pretty darn good - and it counts as success.is a "vaccine" being 60% effective good news?
I think that while we lay people might not see 60% as anything special, the scientific world of immunology regards 60% as pretty darn good - and it counts as success.
it just looked to me like the thread was caught up in pseudo political bickering and òn the way to closure. Just IMO.
When I did that last week, the same sort of thing happened to us - I got an email straight away, but the one for my wife, via my email, didn't arrive until the next morning.
Masterful example of 'stating the bleeding obvious'!In your opinion.![]()
See post #18957Masterful example of 'stating the bleeding obvious'!
''Public Health England (PHE) said the difference in effectiveness between the vaccines after two doses may be explained by the fact that rollout of second doses of AstraZeneca was later than for the Pfizer vaccine, which was approved first.
Other data shows it takes longer to reach maximum effectiveness with the AstraZeneca vaccine,'' PHE said.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57214596
is a "vaccine" being 60% effective good news?