garyinderry
Ryder Cup Winner
I made a good choice in 2008 then - Ping i10 cavities. Still play with them.
You Will blow ur mind if you try the i500s
I made a good choice in 2008 then - Ping i10 cavities. Still play with them.
When do you think a whole set will come down to under £50 on ebay?You Will blow ur mind if you try the i500s
When do you think a whole set will come down to under £50 on ebay?
I might not live long enough.
I can only agree with what it means or "feels" to me. I have no way of being certain of what it means or "feels" to others.So you agree that cavity backs have ‘feel’ - whatever that is?
Perfect description of my new Callaway apex CBs.I like "bladey" forged cavity backs. All the feel but a bit more forgiveness. Best of both worlds.
Cake eaten.
Disagree completelySurprised at the number of people who prefer to have a worse golf score for the benefit of looks and the occasional feel. I am not sure the feel is even a thing - yes, the off-sweet-spot hits with a blade feel worse, therefore the contrast with with perfect strike stronger and rarer. But perfect strikes on either will feel the same. To each his own, though I feel golf is about scoring not feel. And we know must feel is actually sound.
With which bit ?Disagree completely
Is an off centre hit more likely to be in the wrong direction?One of the problems I have with the forgiving nature of cavity back/ perimeter weighting is that the off-centre hit reaches the greenside bunker, but the same shot with the blade falls short of the bunker leaving an easier shot in.
This sounds like they opinion of one who has no soul and only cares about the score.Surprised at the number of people who prefer to have a worse golf score for the benefit of looks and the occasional feel. I am not sure the feel is even a thing - yes, the off-sweet-spot hits with a blade feel worse, therefore the contrast with with perfect strike stronger and rarer. But perfect strikes on either will feel the same. To each his own, though I feel golf is about scoring not feel. And we know must feel is actually sound.
Blades are really only still with us because marketing needs segmentation, aspirational, and pathway product ranges. Super game improver - cavity back - 'player' irons (the term is laughable - are the rest of golfers not players too) - fake blades (hollow ones, camouflaged as blades, for those who aspire to the blade story, but deserve credit for recognising that they harm their game), and blades. Blades the pinnacle of the narrative.
Racing off to find their dictionary.?.Surprised at the number of people who think the score is more important than the looks, where are all the aesthetes of the game?
It's not all about the score.
But each to his own.
Surprised at the number of people who think the score is more important than the looks, where are all the aesthetes of the game?
It's not all about the score.
But each to his own.
I could not agree more with this. I also don't understand why people care so much about how any club looks. Surely you should just use whatever gives you the best scores, regardless of how it looks.I got to Cat 1 with blades, but have been using cavities for 20 years now. Why make the game harder for yourself. I don’t believe that blades give more control over cavity backs either. The ball doesn’t know what type of club it is being hit with.
I guess most of us don't play professionally or elite amateur level so if the looks, feel or sound of a club gives you pleasure why not use it.I could not agree more with this. I also don't understand why people care so much about how any club looks. Surely you should just use whatever gives you the best scores, regardless of how it looks.
Same goes for golf bags, all clothes, motor cars even.I could not agree more with this. I also don't understand why people care so much about how any club looks. Surely you should just use whatever gives you the best scores, regardless of how it looks.