SwingsitlikeHogan's latest activity

When you look at all the money wasted on LIV and to a lesser extent this nonsense TGL, it's shocking and a really bad look for golf as a...

Oh OK then - not ambiguous at all. .

…since you are making the point I might suggest that ‘regardless of where the stance is’ is ambiguous, as it can be read to refer to...

The answer was not clear to me - it may have been in the words used and/or my misunderstanding of the words used - probably the latter...

Perfect thankyou - your 1. answers my query. Apologies to all others trying to get me to understand but due to my being...erm...well...

Cor Blimey😀! Course it does address the issue. That’s what we’ve been addressing, much to KenL’s irritation 😀. It goes like this…..you...

He seemed paranoid about those behind us thinking that he was part of a group holding others up. We weren’t.

What was up with him? If he had somewhere else to be then he shouldn't have bothered turning up. 😂

I get all of that, but that doesn’t seem to address the issue of the stance following the drop in the bunker being in an abnormal ground...

Yes. He could have had relief but the ball would still have to be dropped in the bunker.

I can stand corrected but I don't think I mentioned 'water hazard'...indeed I also didn't introduce 'penalty area' into the discussion...

Thing is that it doesn't sound like Nick's playing companion was given the opportunity to take stance relief in the GA whilst being then...

Ken, it’s not difficult, it’s interesting. SILH raised an unusual scenario which in a nice way exercised the mind away from some of the...

Playing with another couple in a winter comp stableford round...with them but not against them. He (of the other pair and a nice enough...

But in your example could he have taken (stance) relief from the rabbit hole, picked his ball up, and then from where he had moved to...