USER1999
Grand Slam Winner
My course has gone over board in the last few years of having waist deep rough in places where if it was only 4" deep, there would be no shot to the green.
Having wasted about 40 minutes today looking for balls (i lost 3, my partners lost more) is there any point? It's a busy course, full of handicapped golfers.
I have lost balls where the second shot would require a 250 yard hit with a 50 yard cut. Even if it was fairway, who could hit this? Why not allow the golfer to find his ball, but then have to chip out?
Where is the fun (and I do play golf for fun) in losing and hunting for so many balls?
We have loads of mature woodland, but to get in it requires carrying 20 yards of bundu. You have more chance of finding the ball in the woods.
Yes, I could play a 5i off every tee. Whoopee. That's not fun.
If they start to lose members, they have only themselves to blame. Losing 3 balls a round is not sustainable. Not to me. It looks pretty, but it's just daft.
Having wasted about 40 minutes today looking for balls (i lost 3, my partners lost more) is there any point? It's a busy course, full of handicapped golfers.
I have lost balls where the second shot would require a 250 yard hit with a 50 yard cut. Even if it was fairway, who could hit this? Why not allow the golfer to find his ball, but then have to chip out?
Where is the fun (and I do play golf for fun) in losing and hunting for so many balls?
We have loads of mature woodland, but to get in it requires carrying 20 yards of bundu. You have more chance of finding the ball in the woods.
Yes, I could play a 5i off every tee. Whoopee. That's not fun.
If they start to lose members, they have only themselves to blame. Losing 3 balls a round is not sustainable. Not to me. It looks pretty, but it's just daft.