NeilTappin
GM Staff
Afternoon all,
I've just read an article on The Times website from Simon Barnes about Tiger Woods - http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/columnists/simon_barnes/ and I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.
When it comes to choosing sporting comment from journalists or former players, I (not surprisingly) always prefer the former. It seems to me that journalists are in a better position to place a sporting event or achievement into a greater overall context.
However, it seems to me that this piece from Simon Barnes highlights the fact that he's not a golfer. That he doesn't understand the intricacy of the sport seems to shine through.
Anyway, I'd be interested to hear what you think about this piece and where you all stand on whether you prefer sporting analysis to come from journos or former players.
Neil
I've just read an article on The Times website from Simon Barnes about Tiger Woods - http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/columnists/simon_barnes/ and I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.
When it comes to choosing sporting comment from journalists or former players, I (not surprisingly) always prefer the former. It seems to me that journalists are in a better position to place a sporting event or achievement into a greater overall context.
However, it seems to me that this piece from Simon Barnes highlights the fact that he's not a golfer. That he doesn't understand the intricacy of the sport seems to shine through.
Anyway, I'd be interested to hear what you think about this piece and where you all stand on whether you prefer sporting analysis to come from journos or former players.
Neil