D
Ye Olde Boomer
Well-known member
Sorry to hear of your terrible incident.
We have them, too, as you know.
Our world has gone mad, it seems.
Everybody is seriously pissed off about something.
We all need to find a better way of handling our rage than to go roaming around hurting innocent people.
We have them, too, as you know.
Our world has gone mad, it seems.
Everybody is seriously pissed off about something.
We all need to find a better way of handling our rage than to go roaming around hurting innocent people.
Released from prison for terror related offences and under active surveilance. There are going to be a lot of questions that need answering but hopefully all of those injured can make a full recovery.
Wolf
Well-known member
That part right there massive questions about it.... Under active surveillance to all intents would lead people to assume he was constantly being watched since his release so how was he able to get to the centre in a populated area with a bloody big machete and a vest fake or otherwise on show.
Thoughts definitely with the victims at this time and hope that full recovery can be made. But its hard to get past those questions isn't it at the moment especially for the victims and their families.
SocketRocket
Ryder Cup Winner
We have the age old dilemma of how a humane society deals with an inhumane person.
4LEX
Well-known member
Unfortunately theres so many of these scumbags on the terror watch list you can't afford to watch them 24/7. It takes a team of 12 to cover one person for 24 hours. Do the salaries and times it by the numbers and it's not viable. You've got rely on accurate intelligence and data to assess the key threats. One or two will always slip by. But for every one that gets through hundreds are stopped.
The intelligence community has saved thousands of lives every year and never gets the plaudits.
backwoodsman
Tour Winner
Yes, this all accepted.
But the question people will be asking is, if he was considered dangerous enough to warrant that type of surveillance, why was he let out in the first place?
(And yes, I know there are plausible explanations, but in my mind, they still mean someone got something wrong...)
SwingsitlikeHogan
Major Champion
My understanding was that it was simply as a result of a condition of his sentence...and so clearly any conditions set at sentencing that would prevent release were not met.
clubchamp98
Journeyman Pro
Maybe sentences for terrorists need to be looked at .
Don’t automatically half the sentence unless they prove themselves changed.
But radicalisation is taking place in prison.
How to stop that is hard .
Only thing is solitary confinement,I can’t see any other answer.
But can’t see that happening.
Don’t automatically half the sentence unless they prove themselves changed.
But radicalisation is taking place in prison.
How to stop that is hard .
Only thing is solitary confinement,I can’t see any other answer.
But can’t see that happening.
