Strawberries and cream anyone?

Is there any other sport that gets as much coverage on the BBC? This afternoon it is on BBC1, BBC2 and the red button. It will be the same for the next two weeks. :(
 
So people complain when BBC don't show commitment to sport and then people complain when they show commitment to a sport - blimey the BBC can never win.

Love Wimbledon- go every year as well , it's a superb sporting event
 
Is there any other sport that gets as much coverage on the BBC? This afternoon it is on BBC1, BBC2 and the red button. It will be the same for the next two weeks. :(

Fixed camera positions......almost as cheap as snooker to produce.
They also make a fortune selling it on.
It would be interesting to see what the UK viewing figures are though.
 
I hear there are one or two other channels available if one does not like tennis. Also from reading previous threads on here I thought the BBC was a lefty tax on everyone that no one watches any more. So not sure why people are upset what is on it.
 
Fixed camera positions......almost as cheap as snooker to produce.
They also make a fortune selling it on.
It would be interesting to see what the UK viewing figures are though.

For the finals it's a big share of the viewing figures - 13 mil alone on BBC in U.K.
 
For the finals it's a big share of the viewing figures - 13 mil alone on BBC in U.K.

Id imagine helped somewhat by Murray being in it. If the ladies got even half that total I'd be amazed!

its part of British summer now so don't see the reason people complain. But I do agree that it's an easy and cheap sport for the BBC to cover. And keeps the coffers filled. So won't kid myself that BBC are doing some great service showing it for the people.

As per all broadcast companies. If it makes financial sense they do it. If it doesn't then they get rid.
 
Id imagine helped somewhat by Murray being in it. If the ladies got even half that total I'd be amazed!

its part of British summer now so don't see the reason people complain. But I do agree that it's an easy and cheap sport for the BBC to cover. And keeps the coffers filled. So won't kid myself that BBC are doing some great service showing it for the people.

As per all broadcast companies. If it makes financial sense they do it. If it doesn't then they get rid.
Spot on :thup:

The 13 million is also a red herring, it peaked at 13 million for 5 minutes during the final, it was an average of 9 million for the final itself.

The years recently when Murray hasn't been in the final it has had an average of 7 million.
 
It would be interesting to see what the UK viewing figures are though.[/QUOTE]

Ave about 1.8 million yesterday, the final last year was over 9 million.
 
Id imagine helped somewhat by Murray being in it. If the ladies got even half that total I'd be amazed!

its part of British summer now so don't see the reason people complain. But I do agree that it's an easy and cheap sport for the BBC to cover. And keeps the coffers filled. So won't kid myself that BBC are doing some great service showing it for the people.

As per all broadcast companies. If it makes financial sense they do it. If it doesn't then they get rid.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2262742/13.1-million-viewers-watch-Nadal-beat-Federer.html

Seems it peaked higher with Fed and Nadal final

As for it being cheap and easy - sorry but that's not the case far from it
 
Top